Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 23 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Kastalia-Fountain_inside_the_Arkadenhof,_University_of_Vienna-1311.jpg[edit]

File:Lupinus Stradch.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lupin flowers on the side of the Highway M10 (Ukraine) near Stradch. --Mykola Swarnyk 02:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality because of extreme oversaturation. --Hubertl 04:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment What about previous version? It seamed too blue to me. Mykola Swarnyk 16:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  • maybe this will be better? Mykola Swarnyk 16:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed. Oversaturated greens--Lmbuga 17:43, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:BustoaSarmiento-Tandil.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bust to Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 16:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)*  Comment needs some perspective corrections. The technical quality is sufficient for QI. IMO --Hubertl 17:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ezarate 20:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Another version uploaded --Ezarate 00:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Ok for me now --Hubertl 22:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too bright for me. --Mattbuck 08:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC) colors levels reduced
  •  Oppose I can't read the signs: Most of the important area of the picture is a bit blurried. Unbalanced IMO. Low resolution--Lmbuga 13:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Wraxall 2013 MMB 96 Christmas Tree.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Christmas tree. Mattbuck 06:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Unfortunalty good idea but a bit dark --Billy69150 09:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC) it need a crop at right for to avoid the door --Christian Ferrer 21:44, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Mattbuck 07:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unfortunate crop: top is missing. --Palauenc05 20:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
    There was a not insignificant amount of tree beyond what is visible. Mattbuck 20:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Palauenc05 --Billy 17:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Tip_of_Trullo_in_Alberobello_2015.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tip of Trullo in Alberobello 2015 --Livioandronico2013 10:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Bello. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blown sky top right? --Charlesjsharp 12:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
    •  Support Irrelevant --Moroder 07:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition seems seems a little bit off center and tilted. Also I don't like the large nearly contrast less light grey areas. There is not much to see. The Bricks in the foreground are not sharp and the back ground is pretty much featureless grey (which might have been good if some more intersesting stuff was in the middle) --Aiwok 13:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Irrelevant also for me --Σπάρτακος 12:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable. --Smial 11:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 20:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Camouflaged oriental garden lizard.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Camouflaged oriental garden lizard --AntanO 10:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Some minor flaws but overall good quality and QI. --Cccefalon 10:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Head not sharp --Charlesjsharp 12:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 07:42, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, it's nice but the unfocussed flower of the right is disturbing. Head is not realy in focus IMO. --Lmbuga 12:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'll assume that the animal is the focus, if yes it is not sharp --Denkmalhelfer 12:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Harburg-Außenmühlenteich.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Der erste warme Freitag 2015 wird benutzt, um das Jahr im Freien zu feiern. --ArishG 21:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportNice mood. QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 06:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
     Oppose Sky blown out. Aber sowas von, da nützt auch die beste Stimmung nix. --Cccefalon 07:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Der Himmel ist nun mal nicht immer blau. Mir gefallen die dezenten Farben sehr gut; aber sicher ist das Geschmackssache. -- Spurzem 08:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The Wörnitz Harburger Stadtpark Valley is a romantic place.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 20:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Are you all blind-folded by spring mood? The branches are completly eaten away by the overblown sky. This has nothing to do with blue or grey sky, it is just a notable photographic mistake. I thought, I am dealing here with photographers but instead, I have to read a completly stupid support vote The Wörnitz Valley is a romantic place. This is kindergarden in it's purest and poorest form. --Cccefalon 07:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

  •  Comment Just a little humor to bring joy, it's Spring as you say Sorry for the geolocation errors, That said the pic seems (to me) technically correct, under a spring sky of April.- As said Spurzem "Le ciel n'est pas toujours bleu, en cette période. J'aime les couleurs subtiles très bien; mais cela est sûrement une question de goût"..--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 08:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Cccfalon.--Hubertl 08:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, blown out sky --Denkmalhelfer 13:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support der Himmel stört mich nicht. --Ralf Roletschek 11:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 20:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Ehemaliges_Forsthaus_%28D-5-76-151-106%29_02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Forsthouse in Nerreth, Wendelstein Middlefrankonia --Derzno 09:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
    Needs perspective correction and fix of the strong CA Poco a poco 10:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline ✓ Done new version uploaded. --Derzno 15:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
    QI -- Spurzem 07:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)  Support -- Spurzem 08:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The CA is gone but the perspective needs an improvement --Poco a poco 10:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
     Support--Palauenc05 07:44, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It needs perspective correction. Too tight for my taste--Lmbuga 19:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Crop is really pretty tight. Light and colour are quite good imho --Aiwok 10:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark. --Denkmalhelfer 12:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Needs perspective correction --Billy (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Nyala (Tragelaphus angasii) female.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Nyala (Nyala angasii) female, uMkhuse Game Park, KwaZulu Natal --Charlesjsharp 22:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose bad light, strong disturbing shadows and overexposed area on one leg --Christian Ferrer 11:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment New version uploaded with partial brightening. 2nd opinion please on this harsh oppose. I do not see bad light, or strong disturbing shadows --Charlesjsharp 20:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sorry, the tree trunk, on the right side of the pic, brings back very disturbing shadows .--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but a part of the tree end on the animal and confuse me. --Denkmalhelfer 13:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)