Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 22 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Zebu_near_Gondar.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A zebu on the road between Gondar and Debarq, Ethiopia --Bgag 03:35, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
     Oppose not for me. Charlesjsharp 07:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
     Support Interesting motif, sharp enough. --Palauenc05 16:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC).
     Support Good quality IMO. --PJDespa 06:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Palauenc05. -- Ikan Kekek 07:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support per Palauenc05. -- DerFussi 12:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:2016_Rangun,_Oddział-3_Banku_Ekonomicznego_Mjanmy_(01).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Myanma Economic Bank Branch-3. Yangon, Myanmar. --Halavar 15:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Nice angle, but too unsharp Support Better --Daniel Case 19:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New, fixed version uploaded right now with improved sharpness level. --Halavar 19:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough. Hint: You shouldn't set the polarizer always to maximum effect. Intense colours and deep blue sky are nice, but sometimes look somewhat unnatural, esp. in wide angle shots. --Smial 08:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:2012_Powiat_cieszyński,_Marklowice_Górne,_Tablica_wjazdu_do_miasta_Jastrzębie-Zdrój.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Entry sign to the Jastrzębie-Zdrój city. Marklowice Górne, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 11:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Sky is oversaturated OK  weak support; it still looks awfully blue but not unnnaturally so. --Daniel Case 19:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done New better version uploaded right now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 08:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:2012_Jastrzębie-Zdrój,_Kaplica_na_ulicy_Szybowej_(01).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Chapel on Szybowa Street. Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 11:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --GT1976 12:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment This is not a good picture. See sky and leaves. I do not even understand that it is proposed, but I will not decline, on the same day, three photos of the same author--Lmbuga 21:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sky and leaves are not important. --Halavar 22:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • You're right: Not important for an image other than QI IMO, I'm sorry  Oppose --Lmbuga 00:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Ermell 06:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Lmbuga. Also distracting fill-in flash with reflections. --Smial 13:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Canon_PowerShot_S45_-_main_board-4833.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Canon PowerShot S45 - main board. By User:Raymond --Achim Raschka 04:51, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support OK --Verum 18:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
     Oppose Dust spots (see notes). Perhaps overexposed or poor detail IMO--Lmbuga 00:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Looks good to me. The dust spots I'm seeing would seem to actually be in the picture, not the lens, and they're tiny. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your review. I have cleaned up the dust spots. Raymond 06:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good sharpness and very informative. Although I'd suggest somewhat less contrast, and somewhat reduced exposure, to reduce the burnt spots at the solder points. I know, this is not a simple task ;-) --Smial 10:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 17:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:BijouEgyptien MHNT.ETH.2012.24.27.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wide, finely decorated bracelet --Ercé 08:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The work on the borders between the background and the objects has not been successful. --Peulle 09:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK to me. Charlesjsharp 13:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. --Basotxerri 17:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peule. PS CS6 that you have used should have the "refine edges" feature, maybe you can give it another try? -- DerFussi 17:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I added some notes in case people can't see what I mean. I'm all for creating a unicoloured background in images such as these, but it has to be done right.--Peulle 10:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:09, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Black_heron_(Egretta_ardesiaca).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Black heron (Egretta ardesiaca), Botswana --Charlesjsharp 14:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Weak support Could have been sharper.--Famberhorst 15:02, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry, sorry (see head). QI is much more IMO. Foreground is disturbing (see note)--Lmbuga 23:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per User:Lmbuga. Sorry, but I must agree. Not a QI --Halavar 10:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 17:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC)