Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 20 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Strohfeld_in_Hof_20200405_125022.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A little straw field in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Mobile phone snapshot. --Kallerna 05:13, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 Question Where ist the reason? Cameras can take bad photos, phone cameras can take good photos, both is possible, especially in 2020 --PantheraLeo1359531 08:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Snapshot: compositionwise the photo is IMO far from QI level. --Kallerna 12:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. @Kallerna: wether the image was shot on a phone is not relevant. The image is well composed, lit and sharp. A QI to me. --MB-one 12:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Yes, well-lit and sharp over most of the picture frame. MB-one and I differ on the composition, but I see no reason not to promote this photo to QI. -- Ikan Kekek 10:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Four_ok,_everything_is_fine.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination All îê, all will be excellent --Alexandr frolov 03:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment Uneven borders and a quadratic aspect ration would seem better for this motif. --MB-one 10:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support We're not trying to be art critics here (like at FPC), if meets the critera then it's a pass. --King of Hearts 04:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Let's discuss. --MB-one 10:53, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per King of Hearts --Grtek 18:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Solid. The objection seems very nitpicky to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:34, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Funny and good -- Spurzem 13:09, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I'm not seeing anything wrong.--Peulle 14:17, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Zwei_Gänse_am_Pfaffenteich_20200405_121303.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Two geese at the Pfaffenteich. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:16, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Nice image, good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 15:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The main subjects form maybe 5 % of the photo. --Kallerna 05:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment For me, the environment was important here --PantheraLeo1359531 08:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I can go along with that. Commons needs images of geese in their surroundings too, not just closeups. I think the categories need tweaking, though, to include the species. These are Branta canadensis.--Peulle 12:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality, and you got eye contact from at least one of the geese if not both. -- Ikan Kekek 03:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Castelo_dos_Mouros,_Sintra,_Portugal,_2019-05-25,_DD_123.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castelo dos Mouros, Sintra, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Sonya7iv 13:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Harsh light - partially overexposed, high contrast. --Kallerna 05:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Kallerna - some blown areas. -- Ikan Kekek 03:54, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 20:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:ArT_of_opEN_doors_project_-_Travessa_dos_Escaleres_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination One of the doors of the "ArT of opEN doors" project, Travessa dos Escaleres 8, Funchal --Llez 05:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Partially overexposed. --Kallerna 05:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 03:56, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Bahnhof-Mettmann-Stadtwald-mit-Regiobahn-Triebwagen-2019.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mettmann Stadtwald station with train of Regiobahn and historic railway building --Tuxyso 18:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose top crop --Charlesjsharp 08:12, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I do not agree, please CR. Main motif it not the building but the building together with train in the foreground. IMHO no quality defect. --Tuxyso 13:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Charlesjsharp, the composition is awkward here. --—kallerna (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, that cropped building really stands out, sorry.--Peulle 12:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Angkor_Wat,_Camboya,_2013-08-16,_DD_075.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 10:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lack of detail. --Kallerna 05:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - I think this one is good for the time of day and weather. -- Ikan Kekek 04:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Fiordo_de_Troll,_Lofoten,_Noruega,_2019-09-05,_DD_77-84_PAN.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trollfjord, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 16:20, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Insufficient quality. the top of the mountain looks significantly blurred --Wilfredor 16:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
    ✓ New version after a rework and please consider that the image has over 90 MPx --Poco a poco 20:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support I think it is okay now --PantheraLeo1359531 18:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good, especially if one considers the resoultion. --Aristeas 09:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 Oppose too dark, blown clouds, unsharp Seven Pandas 20:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

  •  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 21:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 20:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)