Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 20 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Vitoria - Salburua - Largartija 01.jpg[edit]

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Ikan Kekek 07:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vila_no_Parque_Biribiri.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Vila no Parque Biribiri --Rodrigo.Argenton 00:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose IMO not good enough for a QI. Fixable errors: slight perspective issue, CAs. IMO unfixable: lack of sharpness, highlights blown in the sky. --Basotxerri 08:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
    •  CommentBasotxerri there is a lack of depth of field, not in sharpness, the main subject is in focus, and highlights blow out of the main subject not important at all... and it's "fixable", was a choice. --Rodrigo.Argenton 13:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Basotxerri. --Smial 09:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose perspective issues.--Peulle 09:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose perspective should be fixed in this case, although we obviously look upwards and would expect a perspective distortion, but its still a slight one. And I agree, blown highlights and a lack of sharpness. This sensor could provide a sharper image, i think. -- DerFussi 12:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Jacana spinosa MHNT.ZOO.2010.11.2.22.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination egg of northern jacana - Œuf de Jacana du Mexique --Ercé 16:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but these flash reflections are really distracting. --Code 05:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice, but sorry, I agree my previous speaker here -- DerFussi 12:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree too. Too distracting. -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Petřvald_kostel_sv._Jindřicha.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Church of Saint Henry in Peřvald, Czech Republic --T.Bednarz 12:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • A weak  Support, because it might have been sharper and warmer (white balance more yellow). --Michielverbeek 13:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do not agree, because image has several problems. Chromatic aberration, perspective distortion and image is not sharp enough. --Halavar 16:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Halavar. IMO the lack of sharpness isn't fixable. --Basotxerri 06:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per my two previous speakers. -- DerFussi 07:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 09:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 07:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 10:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)