Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 15 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Goëngarijpsterpoelen_(Frysk)_Goaiïngarypster_Puollen_(d.j.b.)_25.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Goëngarijpsterpoelen (Frysk) Goaiïngarypster Puollen View of the lakes from Heerenzijl. The first rays of sunshine in the morning dispel the mist. and shine on the trees and the reeds.
    --Famberhorst 05:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but it looks a bit blurry and more than a bit grainy, especially the sky. --Stoxastikos 16:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough to be printed at A4 or letter size or even bigger. --Smial 08:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - It's beautiful and misty, as described. -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Lighting is fine. --Palauenc05 15:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 15:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Frozen_waterfall_near_Squamish_February_17_2019.jpeg[edit]

  • Nomination Frozen waterfall near Squamish February 17 2019 --Alex of Canada 05:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  • Cold be also hydro poles in canada...strange perspective though... --Der Angemeldete 14:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
  • What do you mean strange perspective? You have mentioned this on two images, but I'm not sure what it means. ~~~~
  • Somehow my comment disappeared, so just a short note: the pole is rectangular, the street goes up and the cliff behind is olique. That's a quite strange landscape, isn't it? Have you maybe photographed it from below like sitting or lying somewhere benaeth the street? Same with the great colored tree you captured so well. But there it looks like you photographed from above.Der Angemeldete 01:36, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
  • I did a temporary 3,5 spin clockwise and all seems to sort itself out, the wall then running horizontal and the trees in front upright. I think the pole looks rectangular because of the strong side light... this happens and I don't think it's a problem. With the spin the pole is in nice dramatic perspective and just stays in the pic. There is a little noise in the snow in the shadow on the left, but this wouldn't bother me much; others might be picky. This has potential for acceptance as a good pic. Acabashi 17:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Piotr Bart 14:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support (weak) Why? The frozen waterfalls look great, in spite of the pole and the powerlines, which were there, unfortunately. So let's discuss this. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Some places are too dark, and parts of the highlights appear blown.--Peulle 08:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - too dark, as Peulle says, and also too noisy in shadows. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've worked on it a bit, and added a version under 'other versions'. Still might not be good enough. Acabashi 13:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 15:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Pantai_Telawas_Lombok.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2017. By User:Ramantara --Aldnonymous 15:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The CA fringes should be removed. --Ermell 17:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 18:44, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
I disagree. --Ermell 18:46, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose chromatic aberrations, a bit too much noise, and also it has been downsized.--Peulle 06:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Weird look, especially in the water, and probably too small for this kind of photo. -- Ikan Kekek 08:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Elang_Jawa.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Elang Jawa/Javan Hawk Eagle (Nisaetus bartelsi) adalah burung endemik Pulau Jawa. Burung yang diyakini sebagai sosok nyata Burung Garuda (Lambang Negara Indonesia) bernasib tragis, dimana burung ini populasinya terus merosot setiap tahun karena perburuan dan rusaknya habitat. By User:Prastyoeko --Aldnonymous 15:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  LGTM --Tulsi Bhagat 17:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Too blurry IMO. --Ermell 17:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose blurred and noisy. Charlesjsharp 21:40, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 06:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 08:59, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 13:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Münster,_Schlossplatz,_Frühjahrssend_--_2019_--_4180.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Ferris wheel at the funfair “Send” in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Nice framing --Podzemnik 03:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Piotr Bart 14:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment If you think, it is insufficiant quality, please give a reason for your vote. Thank you. --XRay 15:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support A good shot under difficult circumstances. --PtrQs (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Per PtrQs --Michielverbeek 21:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support QI. Poco a poco 16:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 15:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Ayuntamiento, Nepas, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 51.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Town hall, Borjabad, Soria, Spain. --Poco a poco 11:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    CAs at the roof edges --MB-one 13:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
     Oppose Insufficient quality. --Piotr Bart 19:13, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
    I removed the traces of CA, I do believe that this shot is a QI. The comment "insufficient quality" is btw too ambiguous. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality now. --MB-one 14:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - I agree. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 15:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)