Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 14 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Salvador Dali A, Philippe Halsman. Upload by Trialsanderrors. undefined 17:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Declined Not a work by Commoner. --A.Savin 18:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination EM9 at Uzunovo station, Moscow Oblast, Russia --A.Savin 17:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of John the Baptist in Venyov, Tula Oblast, Russia --A.Savin 17:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Male Wood Duck, Aix_sponsa, close-up portrait. Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK. --Baresi franco 17:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Right side window in the choir of St. Nikolaus of Tolentino, Rösrath, showing ressurection of Christ --Cccefalon 16:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Oboronnaya street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 16:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Our Lady of the Rosary church in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 15:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Fine enough for QI, IMO.--Jebulon 15:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Forsbach, Germany: "Pusteblume" a sculpture of the artist Robin Kurka, 2013. --Cccefalon 15:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Flower bud of a Magnolia (beaver tree).--
Famberhorst 15:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Flower bud of a Magnolia (beaver tree).--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Mountains around Dorfgastein, Austria. --High Contrast 14:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Noisy and pixellated sky, chromatic noise in the clouds, sorry. Nice place, light and composition nevertheless.--Jebulon 15:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaiser Bier der Großbrauerei Brauerei Wieselburg serviert in Österreich. --High Contrast 14:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Bgag 14:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination an old water tap --Aathavan jaffna 13:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Overprocessed. --Cccefalon 16:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a pair of parrots --Aathavan jaffna 13:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Strong pixelation, looks like a painting, not a QI, sorry --Poco a poco 19:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination a safety wax match box and matches --Aathavan jaffna 13:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Obviously poor quality. --A.Savin 17:27, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination an unripe papaya --Aathavan jaffna 13:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overexposure and unsharp. --A.Savin 17:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rösrath, Germany: Rose window of St. Nikolaus von Tolentino Church --Cccefalon 13:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination The seaport Rabotcheostrovsk on the short way to Solovki --Vitold Muratov 14:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Overprocessed, resulting in loss of fine details. --Cccefalon 14:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Lausanne Sport vs FC Sion - Avril 2014 - Vincent Rüfli & Yoric Ravet --Ludo29 11:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 17:15,11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mariánské square in Jablunkov, Czech Republic --Halavar 10:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained glass window with the image of Saint Henry II in the church in Jaworze, Poland --Halavar 10:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination South tower and gargoyle of St. Stephen's Cathedral, Vienna --Uoaei1 09:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, not QI, sorry --Poco a poco 19:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination River Thames and City of London. Mattbuck 07:13, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anacapri, street sign in Anacapri --Berthold Werner 06:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion ok --Cccefalon 14:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ile de Thau Neighbourhood, Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good. --Florstein 16:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Salt evaporation ponds, Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ribes sanguineum. Blooms in spring.--
Famberhorst 04:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Malchen53 08:41, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Ribes sanguineum. Blooms in spring.--
-
- Nomination Park at the Linke Wienzeile, Wien river with descent. --Herzi Pinki 22:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 14:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gradner chapel, statue of Mary. Favoriten, Vienna --Herzi Pinki 22:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Malchen53 07:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Banteay Kdei, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Malchen53 08:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paddy field, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality --Halavar 08:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Angkor Wat, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support OK. --A.Savin 17:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ta Som, Angkor, Cambodia --Poco a poco 19:07, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Malchen53 08:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Båtmanskasernen, historic navy building at Skeppsholmen, Stockholm. --ArildV 12:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment Slightly tilted. --Bgag 14:31, 10 April 2014 (UTC) 
Done Thank you.--ArildV 15:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Still tilted to the right. --Bgag 15:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Done--ArildV 07:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 13:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Båtmanskasernen, historic navy building at Skeppsholmen, Stockholm. --ArildV 12:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mourèze, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 04:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality but some CA. --ArildV 15:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Done I did not manage to see it, however I uploaded a new version, I hope it's ok --Christian Ferrer 17:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC) Support good now, it was some CA in the border between the forest and sky.--ArildV 10:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of San Gottardo in Corte from the courtyard of Palazzo Reale --Jbribeiro1 23:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I cannot say that I like the roof in the front, but nethertheless it's gGood quality. --Cccefalon 15:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of San Gottardo in Corte from the Duomo --Jbribeiro1 23:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Malchen53 08:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Morning mist in the nature reserve "Welter Bachauen", Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Wrong WB, purple CA Poco a poco 19:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Fixed Wow. You're really right. The WB was wrong. Thank you.--XRay 14:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Morning mist in the nature reserve "Welter Bachauen", Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Paczków --Jacek Halicki 13:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp, chromatic noise.--Jebulon 16:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capri, Piazetta --Berthold Werner 11:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Please remove two (faint) dust spots in the upper sky at left... and two white 'birds'. --Cayambe 08:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I found 1 dustspot and 3 birds --Berthold Werner 11:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Ok for QI now. --Cayambe 17:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Capri, Piazetta --Berthold Werner 11:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jacobi church, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany. --NorbertNagel 15:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Ben Thanh Market, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 18:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Comment Could you please lighten up the shadows?--Moroder 12:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Done although there was no underexposure Poco a poco 20:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. I didn't say underexposed, I meant dark which is not the same ;-) --Moroder 21:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Ben Thanh Market, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 18:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brass mortar and pestle --Nikodem Nijaki 12:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 12:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camion Unic avec gazogène --Classiccardinal 09:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pleclown 10:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Grain elevator building on the left bank of the River Don, Rostov-on-Don, Russia --Zhanett.b 09:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Right side is leaning inwards. A blurry spot. Can be easily fixed. --Cccefalon 10:11, 2 April 2014 ((UTC)
Info You're right.Thank you! image Correction--Zhanett.b 10:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Verticals are ok now but the blurry spot is still there. --Cccefalon 07:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't see a blurry spot, I think this is QI. Mattbuck 21:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)((UTC)
Info Sorry, but I do not understand where this spot.--Zhanett.b 07:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
It is QI, as soon as the issue is removed. In full resolution the spot is 2 cm right and 2 higher of the railing on top of the right corner of the silo facility. I even made a annotation to roughly locate the area where the spot can be found. (I am not talking about the bird which is 5 cm right of the silo.) --Cccefalon 08:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)((UTC)
InfoThanks for the explanation. Corrected the error, but the current version is displayed as before, I do not understand why.--Zhanett.b 10:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Done--Zhanett.b 04:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. Thank you for being so patient with me. --Cccefalon 15:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Une Seat Ibiza présentée lors du Mondial de l'Automobile de Paris 2012. --Thesupermat 16:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Please correct perspective. Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC) Done--Thesupermat 15:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Still leaning out on the left, but I can understand that correcting that might cause a crop on the left. Mattbuck 21:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
C'est ce qui se passe lorsque l'on redresse les verticales avec DxO --Thesupermat 12:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC) Oui ça penche un peu, mais ça le fait quand même pour QI.--Jebulon 15:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
_09633u.jpg)
_03-2014_img02.jpg)
_03-2014_img11_StJohn_the_Baptist_Church.jpg)
_03-2014_img09_IntStreet.jpg)
_03.JPG)
.JPG)
_01.JPG)
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review[edit]
File:Tiger800a.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Triumph Tiger 800 -- H005 20:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 04:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Below 2MP, vignetting. --P e z i 21:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Not eligible for QIC. No need to send to CR, can be always immediately tagged as decline. --Cccefalon 07:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 11:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC) good picture, vignetting is ok and fits to the subject. The limit 2MP to me not interested, i rate photos, no MP
- Oppose QI ≠ Good photo. Rules are there for a reason and even a iPhone 4 can give much more resolution than 1.2 MP --DXR (talk) 22:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 04:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 04:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Peter Runggaldier Alpine Skier 2.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Peter Runggaldier alpine downhill skier in Gröden, South Tyrol --Moroder 17:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Face too dark and low contrast. Try to lighten it up. -- H005 20:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Done --Moroder 22:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Support Fine now. -- H005 23:12, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI IMO --P e z i 21:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → 
Promoted --Cccefalon 04:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 04:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:2013.06.24-03.-Woblitzsee-Havelberge-Nebelkraehe.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Nebelkrähe - Corvus cornix --Hockei 19:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Info This is the edge of the boat in which I was sitting. --Hockei 20:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Poco. But why not re-cropping to avoid the boat? I made a proposal. And please reduce the magenta channel, there are some tiny magenta areas that look weird. --Cccefalon 05:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Fixed New version. --Hockei 11:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)- Support Yes! QI for me. --Cccefalon 12:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good now Poco a poco 17:34, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI Now --Archaeodontosaurus 15:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 04:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 04:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Kohlberg_Baden-Württemberg_Germany_Panoramic-View-01.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Kohlberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany: Village Kohlberg, seen from the slopes of the former volcano "Jusi" --Cccefalon 14:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Oppose Too much sky. --Milseburg 18:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Is "too much sky" a question of quality? I dont`t think so. --Taxiarchos228 04:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment Cropping the sky would be as easy as a piece of cake. However, this is just a question of personal taste and should not be against a promotion, especially as I cannot see a flaw in the composition. Please, Milseburg, do the assessment about photographic quality and not about personal taste. --Cccefalon 05:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for disturbing the well-established procedures by a newcommer. It is certainly not a matter of taste, but of an unbalanced composition (Commons:Image guidelines). The arrangement is not favorable for a high quality picture. The subject is placed too low. Compared to the over-represented sky it recedes unnecessary. Of course a better composition is easy to make but also eligible --Milseburg 13:49, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support good picture with a good balanced composition --Ralf Roletschek 14:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice and sharp, but unbalanced composition. Horizon in the middle is not a good idea, IMO. A cropped picture with less sky will receive my support--Jebulon 19:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment I will nominate spin-offs of the photo with different horizon levels so that everyone will be happy :) However, I will not withdraw this one, because I am still convinced that the amount of sky is not a reason to decline it. --Cccefalon 05:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- this is a QI, and just a inexpressibly brainfree discussion about a assumed bad composition --Taxiarchos228 18:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI --Christian Ferrer 04:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 03:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 03:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Henriksdalshamnen_February_2012.jpg[edit]
- Nomination New building in Henriksdalshamnen, Stockholm (previously unassessed) --ArildV 18:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose it is lacking sharpness, and some CA --A.Savin 19:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Where did you see CA?--ArildV 20:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Some CA at the left of the red building, but without CA I wouldn't promote this one either --A.Savin 20:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- I found the orginal file and made a new version with LR, more sharpness and contrast. But I dont think it is CA, I have never (as far as I remember) get any CA with this lens. Anyway, I think the new version is QI regarding sharpness.--ArildV 20:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, better sharpness, but I'm not quite sold because of that strange artefacts (?) at some places about the edges of windows etc. (maybe compression, I don't know); I think it needs CR. --A.Savin 17:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 22:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support I think so Jean11 21:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)) (Signaturnachtrag)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 03:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 03:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Weston-super-Mare MMB 68 Grand Pier.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Weston-super-Mare Grand Pier. Mattbuck 07:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Ok --Poco a poco 18:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree, bad light. --Milseburg 20:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support The exposure is according to available light. The contrast is balanced. So nothing to complain about photographic quality. --Cccefalon 05:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support nice light. --Ralf Roleček 14:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - I can't say I like the light much, but this was about the best I could manage. Mattbuck 21:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 03:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 03:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Halverde Korn und Oelmuehle 02.jpg[edit]
- Nomination The watermill at Overmeyer's farm in Hopsten-Halverde, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --J.-H. Janßen 18:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
ccw tilted Poco a poco 19:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC) - Promotion And bad white balance IMO. --Mattbuck 21:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
* New version with some tilt&shift correction. Please review. The WB is somewhat warm, but still in realistic range, no reason to decline. --Smial 13:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose overexposed --Christian Ferrer 18:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC) - Support QI to me now Poco a poco 17:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment There is too much burned out areas (a lot of foliage, sky, water) IMO --Christian Ferrer 11:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. Very atmospheric. --Uoaei1 06:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 04:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 04:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:Golub-Dobrzyń,_Kościół_św._Katarzyny_(Dobrzyń).jpg[edit]
.jpg)
- Nomination St. Catherine of Alexandria Church in Golub-Dobrzyń (Dobrzyń), Poland --1bumer 18:16, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
I would like to see more opinions. Tight crop at top, very yellowish. --Uoaei1 06:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC) - Comment Tilted--Jebulon 10:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Done--1bumer 13:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Would be better with colder White Balance. --Halavar 01:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
- Info I've uploaded new, fixed version. Please revert, if you don't like it. --Halavar 15:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki 21:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Cccefalon 04:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Promoted --Cccefalon 04:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-airport-47.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sunrise at Abu Dhabi International Airport --Ralf Roletschek 11:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Decline SupportGood quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, this version is not a QI to me, there is too much chromatic noise, and some CA --Poco a poco 07:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Oppose as per Poco. --Cccefalon 10:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Cccefalon 04:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Declined --Cccefalon 04:05, 14 April 2014 (UTC)