Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 11 2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Hochstahl Dorfanger .JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Center of Hochstahl a district of Aufsess in Bavaria --Benreis 16:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Please have a look to the top of the image, there is at least one dust spot. And please add a geo location (if possible).--XRay 16:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC) ✓ Done Added geo location. The dust spot is a cloud, see here, it´s the same --Benreis 17:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
     Comment I've added a notice. Do you mean this dust spot/cloud?--XRay 16:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)br/> Comment You are right, I didn´t see it --Benreis 07:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Let's ask for a third opinion.--XRay 16:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's clearly a dust spot. And there are reddish and green fringes at the left and right side. I made annotations. For now not a QI, please rework. --Cccefalon 05:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Russell_Best_-_Paris_Half_Marathon_2014_-_5200.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Russell Best, 18th of Paris Half Marathon 2014, inside the arrival zone. --PierreSelim 09:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Review Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
    Motion blur. --Mattbuck 21:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Cccefalon 06:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Vista_de_Engolasters,_Andorra,_2013-12-30,_DD_03.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination View of Engolasters, Andorra --Poco a poco 07:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Insufficient quality. Important part of the sky is overexposed, otherwise dull, sorry --Moroder 08:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ New version uploaded Poco a poco 20:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose The upper right part of the sky is really not lovely. Of course, it's no more #FFFFFF after shifting the highlights but it still looks weird. The neighbouring grey areas have no depth, they just look vapid. For me it looks unfixable. --Cccefalon 10:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:140321 Shimabara Bay Shimabara Nagasaki pref Japan03o.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination A view of the morning sun of Shimabara Bay --663highland 14:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Strong oppose No offence, but your picture appears grossly underexposed, if you don't mind me saying that to show the severity of it. --Arctic Kangaroo 14:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
     Support lets discuss, in my eyes it is a QI, sunset must be dark --Ralf Roletschek 17:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp. Dustspots. This can never be a QI. --Cccefalon 10:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:140321 Shimabara Bay Shimabara Nagasaki pref Japan04o.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination A view of the morning sun of Shimabara Bay --663highland 14:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline  Strong oppose No offence, but your picture appears grossly underexposed, if you don't mind me saying that to show the severity of it. --Arctic Kangaroo 14:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
     Support lets discuss, in my eyes it is a QI, sunset must be dark --Ralf Roletschek 17:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose It's also lacking sharpness and bears smaller flaws (e.g. blurred birds) resulting from renouncing of postprocessing. --Cccefalon 10:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:13-08-06-abu-dhabi-airport-35.jpg[edit]

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 06:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:View_through_windows_at_Nasrid_Palaces_over_Granada_2014.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination previously unassessedView through windows at Nasrid Palaces over Granada --Tuxyso 10:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support ok. --Blurred Lines 15:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I ask for a discussion because of the halos, and because of the unnatural aspect of the landscape in background. HDR is too much here IMO.--Jebulon 23:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Jebulon, can you please mark "halos" and clarify what is the "unnatural aspect of the landscape in background". In the case here I've used HDR fusion technique to overcome the dynamic liminations of the camera sensor. Nothing unnatural here. --Tuxyso 10:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The view that one has the window is not currently normale.il overtreatment is very visible with a doubling of the edges of pillars. This is an interesting technique, but the result is not natural. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
    • Can you add some image notes and show the areas where the "doubling of the edges" is most notable, just to make sure that we are talking about the same thing. Thanks! --

Tuxyso 10:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done --Archaeodontosaurus 12:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Per Archaeodontosaurus. The halos are all over actually. Jbribeiro1 00:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Cccefalon 06:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Leeds railway station MMB 23 221137 185151.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Leeds railway station. Mattbuck 20:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Oppose Initially I was wowed by the image, but upon closer inspection there are CAs all over. :( And btw, I know I'm voting on QIC, not FPC at the moment. --Arctic Kangaroo 16:53, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
    Fixed Mattbuck 17:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
    Hmm...not quite. Please zoom in and check the entire photo, including the train, tracks, and especially the structures at the top. --Arctic Kangaroo 04:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
    I have zoomed in and don't see anything. Are you sure you checked the new version? Mattbuck 23:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC
    Yup. I just double-confirmed and looked at the new version again. There are red borders everywhere, on the train, the building structures, and even the people. --Arctic Kangaroo 09:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC))
There are some minor ones visible when zoomed in to about 400%, but they are invisible at 100% zoom. Mattbuck 09:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
If it's OK then  Support. --Arctic Kangaroo 14:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I wasn't very sure about the standards regarding CAs here. --Arctic Kangaroo 14:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Cccefalon 06:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)