Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 10 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Berlin: Chinese Garden in Marzahn Gardens of the World --A.Savin 00:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 1 --Jacek Halicki 23:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 00:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 2 --Jacek Halicki 23:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination World Fashion Centre, Amsterdam. --C messier 19:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Profitis Elias church, Crete. --C messier 19:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tatra chamois on Kończysty Wierch in Tatra Mountains --Jakubhal 20:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shell of a Delicate Yoka Star Turban, Guildfordia yoka delicata --Llez 20:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Beautiful multi-stemmed birch (Betula) in the shifting sand.
--Famberhorst 18:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --Llez 20:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Beautiful multi-stemmed birch (Betula) in the shifting sand.
-
- Nomination Salle informatique de la bibliothèque d'Art et d'Archéologie de Genève. --Yann 18:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial photograph of Westerheversand Lighthouse. By Marco Leiter --Moheen Reeyad 17:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Yann 18:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Flower of an Indian Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). --Moheen Reeyad 17:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner. --Yann 18:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Patenga sea beach. --Moheen Reeyad 17:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Oppose Sorry, missing sharpness as there is no detail (e.g. on sands, on water). The picture is overcat'ed since Patenga is redundant, as admin so you should know?? --A.Savin 23:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Topless sitting woman. --Moheen Reeyad 17:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner. --Yann 18:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Narcissus 'Ice Follies' blooms with creamy white flowers. The crown is wide and has a wavy edge.
--Famberhorst 16:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Narcissus 'Ice Follies' blooms with creamy white flowers. The crown is wide and has a wavy edge.
-
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Route Pointer.
--Famberhorst 16:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Route Pointer.
-
- Nomination Minoan palace of Archanes, Crete --Oltau 16:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Minoan palace of Archanes, Crete --Oltau 16:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Église Sainte-Marie-Madeleine de Belcastel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 15:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Nice motif, but it lacks sharpness, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 21:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Philatelic Museum. Museum Planning Area, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 12:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Museum of Singapore. Museum Planning Area, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 12:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice!--Famberhorst 16:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercado Municipal (São Paulo, Brazil) --The Photographer 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 15:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vista lateral esquerda --The Photographer 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 15:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martinelli building Terrace, --The Photographer 12:32, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 15:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: upper funicular station on Merkur --A.Savin 12:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: fountain cascade in the Spa park --A.Savin 12:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: view from Ebersteinburg towards Gaggenau town --A.Savin 12:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baden-Baden: detail of Friedrichsbad bathhouse --A.Savin 12:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Ok --The Photographer 12:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Pico de la Zarza to the Playa de Barlovento, El Islote, and the Playa de Cofete, Fuerteventura --Llez 12:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Ok --The Photographer 12:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination View from the Pico de la Zarza to the Playa de Barlovento, El Islote, and the Playa de Cofete, Fuerteventura --Llez 12:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination San Ferdinando (Naples) - Ceiling --Livioandronico2013 09:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blüten der Kaschmir-Bergenie (Bergenia ciliata) im Alten Botanischen Garten der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen --Frank Schulenburg 09:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seed capsule of cultivated Pansy --Berthold Werner 07:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bas-relief in Persepolis, Iran --Poco a poco 07:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fatimah Ma'sumah Shrine, Qom, Iran --Poco a poco 07:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 07:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shah Nematollah Vali Shrine, Mahan, Iran --Poco a poco 07:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of the old Citadel in Pasargadae, Iran --Poco a poco 07:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Si-o-se Pol, Isfahan, Iran --Poco a poco 07:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice composition. Would be very, very nice under other lighting conditions and without people of course. Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sluice 94 of the Ludwig-Danube-Main-Canal in Eggolsheim --Ermell 06:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Door of the St. Vitus Church in Junkersdorf in Koenigsberg in Lower Franconia --Ermell 06:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestone on the churchyard of the church in Junkersdorf --Ermell 06:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 06:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former rectory in Junkersdorf --Ermell 06:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bidaurreta, as seen from Belascoáin. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 06:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pelota court of Bidaurreta, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 06:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drinking fountain in Bidaurreta, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 06:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amillano, municipality of Allín, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 06:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medical centre of Allín, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 06:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 07:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mud Depot Broek bij Joure. Highly dangerous Quicksand.
--Famberhorst 05:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mud Depot Broek bij Joure. Highly dangerous Quicksand.
-
- Nomination Remember Panel. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
--Famberhorst 05:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Remember Panel. Location: Church of San Rocco surrounded in the military cemetery in Peio Paese.
-
- Nomination Weinkeller in Gettsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 05:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tafel an einem Weinkeller in Gettsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 05:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weinkeller in Gettsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 05:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eine Kellergasse in Gettsdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 05:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 12:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fammensrakken Mûzekamp, Boornzwaag (Netherlands).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Fammensrakken Mûzekamp, Boornzwaag (Netherlands).
-
- Nomination Pumping water Tijnjepolder the Horsewei Boornzwaag.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good focus to main object, but sky a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 05:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Pumping water Tijnjepolder the Horsewei Boornzwaag.
-
- Nomination Groppensteinfall in the Groppenstein Canyon near Obervellach, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mallnitz stream in the Groppenstein Canyon near Obervellach, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mallnitz stream in the Groppenstein Canyon near Obervellach, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trampelpfad in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arch of the western portal to the yard of Gurk Monastery on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 1 --Jacek Halicki 23:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 2 --Jacek Halicki 23:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Perhaps a category related with the saint and the type of post/statue would be useful. Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 5 --Jacek Halicki 23:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Hesitation of Light" a light installation --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion really nice, but two big lens flares over the bridge on the right. Is it correctable? --Carschten 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Done removed flars. --Villy Fink Isaksen 22:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Very good! I like the lower perspective and accept the distortion, but it's a bit ccw tilted, isn't it? --Carschten 01:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Done perspective correction. --Villy Fink Isaksen 08:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Support thanks! --Carschten 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paris in 1859 - its Fortifications, Chemin de fer de (Petite) Ceinture (Paris-Auteuil, Chemin de fer de Ceinture Rive Droite) --ThePromenader 20:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not the work of a Commoner. --Yann 15:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haghpat Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 19:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment beautiful scene, but the brightened shadows of the church is too noisy IMHO. Also CA (see annotation). --Carschten 20:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
New version Poco a poco 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
weak Support: better --Carschten 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sevanavank Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 19:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Comment light issue is really hard... also pixelation around the church and CA, I added example annotations. --Carschten 20:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
New version Poco a poco 19:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Better, but issues are still visible. Overall not good enough for QI to me, sorry. --Carschten 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam. --C messier 15:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Forest in Ain Drahem governorate of Jendouba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 13:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Much too dark and unsharp, sorry. Juliancolton 23:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shahbag Square. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 12:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion OK4QI, coud be sharper though. NB: no need to attribute yourself --A.Savin 12:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Bournazel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 23:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Technical quality is high enough for Q1, but unfortunately the bottom crop spoils the image --Michielverbeek 05:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
I understand, but it was promotion for QI, not featured pictures. Tournasol7 07:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Yes I know. However it is quiet easy to avoid such a crop. Just take some steps back or reduce the zoom --Michielverbeek 05:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
It's not possible, because the back is another building. In this case I withdraw this image. Tournasol7 12:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Lori Berd, Armenia --Poco a poco 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment a) Please fix the perspective, b) please remove the dust spots, c) Can you do sth. about the noise in the sky? --A.Savin 05:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 19:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 23:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two Nubian ibex kids (Capra nubiana) in Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. --Rhododendrites 13:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Awwww..... :) There is a hint of purple CA on the rocks in front of the kids and some green on the rocks behind them. Think you could remove that? --W.carter 14:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Done --Rhododendrites 02:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Looks great now! Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colorful layers of sedimentary rock in Makhtesh Ramon, Israel. --Rhododendrites 13:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion There is some green/purple CA in the lower half of the pic. Think you can remove that? --W.carter 14:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Done? - more subtle change than with the other one -- not sure if it addressed all of what you saw. --Rhododendrites 02:54, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes indeed more subtle, but I'm being picky with this one. ;) Looks great now. Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination EC 216, towed by a DB class 101-engine passes Trautenfels castle and the mountain Grimming. --Liberaler Humanist 15:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me. --C messier 19:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Berlin: Lutheran Church in Halensee --A.Savin 14:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
It's tilted in ccw direction Poco a poco 17:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Fixed. --A.Savin 16:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Done now --The Photographer 12:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion
- Nomination Berlin: Lutheran Church in Halensee --A.Savin 14:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OM in Rakhi --Suyash.dwivedi 19:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough but the description needs to be fixed so that a foreigner can understand what is so special about this piece of jewelry. The categories also needs to be much better, I can't see any festival in this photo. --W.carter 06:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Done Description and catagoryadded. --Suyash.dwivedi 06:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Ok now --The Photographer 12:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) -- Jiel 0:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
CA on beak. Daniel Case 04:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Per Daniel Case, it was not fixed --The Photographer 12:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC) - Decline
- Nomination Red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) -- Jiel 0:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building site of Christophorus school in Mülheim-Kärlich in March 2017
I would approve it but we need to know who nominated this. Daniel Case 16:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC) - Promotion It was nominated by Spurzem --The Photographer 12:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Building site of Christophorus school in Mülheim-Kärlich in March 2017
Consensual review[edit]
File:2014_Pstrążna,_układ_przestrzenny,_11.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 5 --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have to Oppose due to severe blurriness on the left side of the image - see the tree for instance. Juliancolton 02:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Juliancolton. The resolution isn't that high either.--Peulle 06:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Tiger 14MAR(9)ed.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Sumatran Tiger in Dublin Zoo --Jjm596 22:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Too dark, compositional problems, and no accurate categorization. --A.Savin 02:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- New version Thanks for the response, hope this helps! Jjm596 18:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It's now brighter indeed, but otherwise none of my points have been adressed properly. --A.Savin 16:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Okay, could you perhaps elaborate regarding the compositional issues? Thanks --Jjm596 17:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment IMO, the window frames and reflections spoil the composition. A QI of a tiger in zoo could be for example like here. But feel free to request Consensual Review, if you disagree. --A.Savin 21:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I've cropped it (not sure if it's an improvement, I suppose we'll see), and I'll give it a shot at CR --Jjm596 14:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose On the whole, since the tiger is lying still, I think the subject should be rendered better. I do think that Commons needs images of images in captivity behind glass etc. to show the contrast between such animals and tigers in the wild, though.--Peulle 06:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much reflections, visible effects of noise reduction, unfortunate composition. IMO not enough for a QI. --Basotxerri 06:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Procesión_de_la_Inmaculada,_Sevilla,_España,_2015-12-06,_DD_132.JPG[edit]
- Nomination Immaculate procession, Seville, Spain --Poco a poco 07:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Insufficient quality. Distortions and no sky. Sorry. --Moheen Reeyad 17:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I don't understand you, where do you see distortions and what do you mean with "no sky". Please, bear in mind that the subject here is not he church, but the virgin, I was even thinking about cropping the church to balance it better. It looks like a QI to me. Poco a poco 17:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment IMO there is some distortions in the top of the church and the sky is too white. --Moheen Reeyad 17:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I cropped it Poco a poco 20:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please, let me move it to CR as I didn't get any response. It looks ok to me. --Poco a poco 19:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed.--Peulle 06:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Vestre_Ringgade,_Aarhus_-_set_fra_bogtårnet_Statsbiblioteket.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Vestre Ringgade, Aarhus - seen from the top of the book tower State Library (Statsbiblioteket) --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Nice composition. However quiet noisy, especially in the background, so a week support --Michielverbeek 21:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- - It is haze in the background. --Villy Fink Isaksen 22:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Sky blown out and noisy in the background as noted. Juliancolton 02:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Per Juliancolton. Would need a perspective correction, too. --Basotxerri 15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)- Comment - corrections made. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support - I'm OK with the new version for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 20:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Better now. --Basotxerri 20:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Objekt 62 in der Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Weinkeller in Gedersdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)after checking again. --Berthold Werner 05:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Here we go again. Banding stripes on the sky. Herr Kuzel, do you actually read the reviews, or do you come here just to nominate the pictures and the rest is scheissegal? --A.Savin 16:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Da ich kein Engisch spreche, ist das einzige Wort, das ich verstehe "scheissegal" --Manfred Kuzel 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Er bemängelt die Streifenbildung im Himmel, die wohl schon einmal bemängelt wurde. Außerdem fragt er, ob du die Kommentare liest oder einfach nur nominierst. --Berthold Werner 17:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Danke Berthold Werner für die Erklärung. Da alle Kommentare in englisch sind - auch wenn aus der Nominierung ersichtlich ist, daß sie in deutsch erfolgt sind - lese ich sie natürlich nicht, weil ich sie ohnehin nicht verstehe. LG--Manfred Kuzel 04:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Bei den Streifenbildungen handelt es sich um die Stromzuführungen zu den einzelnen Objekten, die über den Giebeln an darauf montierten Masten verläuft. Diese Art der Versorgung mit elektrischer Energie ist für die Kellergassen typisch und wurde daher von mir ganz bewußt nicht entfernt. --Manfred Kuzel 06:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Es geht nicht um die Stromleitungen, sondern um das diagonale Rautenmuster im Himmel. Schau bitte noch einmal genau hin. Wurde der Kamerasensor mal (schlecht) gereinigt? --Basotxerri 07:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Tut mir leid, ich kann dieses Rautenmuster auch bei extremer Vergrößerung nicht sehen.--Manfred Kuzel 08:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Manfred Kuzel: : Ich habe zwei Kommentare auf dem Bild gelassen. --Basotxerri 18:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Basotxerri: Ich verstehe nicht, wieso ich an den markierten Stellen weder Streifen noch Rauten erkennen kann, obwohl ich das Foto in größtmöglicher Vergrößerung betrachte. Ehe wir hier unsere kostbare Zeit vergeuden ziehe ich besser die Nominierung zurück. Einverstanden? LG--Manfred Kuzel 05:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Manfred Kuzel: Du kannst das zurückziehen, klar, bedenke aber bitte, dass bei Deinen Bildern offensichtlich ein Problem besteht, da die Streifen bei mehreren Bildern auftreten. Wenn z. B. der Sensor verschmutzt ist, werden Deine Bilder immer wieder abgelehnt werden. Vielleicht könnte A.Savin noch etwas dazu sagen, da ihm das scheinbar schon vor Längerem aufgefallen ist. --Basotxerri 16:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ich hatte manchmal Streifen im Himmel, wenn ich zu viel im Photoshop aufgehellt habe. Aber so viele wie hier und mit einer durchgehenden Musterung, das ist mir unbekannt und ich habe leider keinen Plan, woher das kommt. --A.Savin 17:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Probiere doch bitte Folgendes: Fotografiere einen hellen neutralen Hintergrund mit einer möglichst kleinen Blende, z. B. f/16 oder f/22, das, wenn es geht, mit verschiedenen Objektiven. Siehst Du ein Muster auf den Fotos mit verschiedenen Objektiven? Dann könnte es Sensorverschmutzung sein. --Basotxerri 20:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ich hatte manchmal Streifen im Himmel, wenn ich zu viel im Photoshop aufgehellt habe. Aber so viele wie hier und mit einer durchgehenden Musterung, das ist mir unbekannt und ich habe leider keinen Plan, woher das kommt. --A.Savin 17:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Manfred Kuzel: Du kannst das zurückziehen, klar, bedenke aber bitte, dass bei Deinen Bildern offensichtlich ein Problem besteht, da die Streifen bei mehreren Bildern auftreten. Wenn z. B. der Sensor verschmutzt ist, werden Deine Bilder immer wieder abgelehnt werden. Vielleicht könnte A.Savin noch etwas dazu sagen, da ihm das scheinbar schon vor Längerem aufgefallen ist. --Basotxerri 16:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Basotxerri: Ich verstehe nicht, wieso ich an den markierten Stellen weder Streifen noch Rauten erkennen kann, obwohl ich das Foto in größtmöglicher Vergrößerung betrachte. Ehe wir hier unsere kostbare Zeit vergeuden ziehe ich besser die Nominierung zurück. Einverstanden? LG--Manfred Kuzel 05:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Manfred Kuzel: : Ich habe zwei Kommentare auf dem Bild gelassen. --Basotxerri 18:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Tut mir leid, ich kann dieses Rautenmuster auch bei extremer Vergrößerung nicht sehen.--Manfred Kuzel 08:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Es geht nicht um die Stromleitungen, sondern um das diagonale Rautenmuster im Himmel. Schau bitte noch einmal genau hin. Wurde der Kamerasensor mal (schlecht) gereinigt? --Basotxerri 07:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Bei den Streifenbildungen handelt es sich um die Stromzuführungen zu den einzelnen Objekten, die über den Giebeln an darauf montierten Masten verläuft. Diese Art der Versorgung mit elektrischer Energie ist für die Kellergassen typisch und wurde daher von mir ganz bewußt nicht entfernt. --Manfred Kuzel 06:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Danke Berthold Werner für die Erklärung. Da alle Kommentare in englisch sind - auch wenn aus der Nominierung ersichtlich ist, daß sie in deutsch erfolgt sind - lese ich sie natürlich nicht, weil ich sie ohnehin nicht verstehe. LG--Manfred Kuzel 04:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Er bemängelt die Streifenbildung im Himmel, die wohl schon einmal bemängelt wurde. Außerdem fragt er, ob du die Kommentare liest oder einfach nur nominierst. --Berthold Werner 17:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - diagonal banding this time. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others.--Peulle 10:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Objekt 22 (Detail) in der Kellergasse Gedersdorf an der Bundesstraße.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Portal eines Weinkellers in Gedersdorf/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 06:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is OK, but not to promote before the bottom and the lower right corner are fixed. There is white perspective correction mark--A.Savin 16:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Deutsch: der weiße Rand unten, der von Perspektiv korrektur übrig geblieben ist, muss weggeschnitten werden. --A.Savin 05:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
- Eine neue Version ist hochgeladen.--Manfred Kuzel 06:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Deutsch: der weiße Rand unten, der von Perspektiv korrektur übrig geblieben ist, muss weggeschnitten werden. --A.Savin 05:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)