Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 08 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle --DeFacto 21:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose lacks details. Probably only a smartphone lens. --Cccefalon 03:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment other opinions and advice please. --DeFacto 18:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Severe lack of detail. Can be seen esp. on grass, but also on the ruin. --A.Savin 18:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 17:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle, William Lord Hastings's Tower from the west.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ashby-de-la-Zouch Castle, William Lord Hastings's Tower --DeFacto 21:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. --Ermell 06:49, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment other opinions and advice please. --DeFacto 18:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Hugo_March_2016_45_(Hugo_Lake).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hugo Lake in Choctaw County, Oklahoma (United States). --Michael Barera 04:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality Ram-Man 01:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
    • I didn't notice the dust spots until you pointed them out, but yes, they should be fixed. Ram-Man 03:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Spots in the upper left corner. Questionable division. Too much empty sky in my eyes. No QI for me yet. --Milseburg 14:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Despite blurring noise reduction still heavy chroma noise. Too high colour saturation. Maybe there is too much "intelligence" working in that camera? Please try "neutral" camera settings. --Smial 10:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 06:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)