Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 04 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Three_Castle_Head_4516_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Three Castle Head, West Cork, Ireland --Jjm596
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Nice view but unfortunately overprocessed, noisy, overexposed sky and tilted. Sorry --Moroder 18:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Horizon should be corrected. Otherwise QI for me. -- Spurzem 20:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Tilt fixed and sky somewhat less overexposed. Hope it's better now. --Jjm596 21:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose - somewhat borderline, but I'm going to side with Moroder: too grainy and unsharp. Juliancolton 17:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:17, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Dunlough_IMGP4460_(2).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Cottage near Dunlough Bay, West Cork, Ireland --Jjm596
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality.Very nice motive but disturbing wire --Moroder 19:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Not excellent but QI for me -- Spurzem 19:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Moroder. The distracting unsharp reeds in the foreground also look to my eyes to have magenta CA in the shadows. -- Ikan Kekek 20:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The wire is not the big problem for me; it may be possible to get this shot from in front of it, but if not we can't go around removing such things in order to get a better shot. Those pieces of grass, though, could easily have been removed.--Peulle 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Peulle, do you mean remove the grass in post? If so I'm afraid I don't have the resource to do that. Jjm596 14:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
No, I mean they could have been removed before the shot was taken. I'm not normally in favour of changing nature in order to get good shots, but in this instance removing those straws would have been easy and could have avoided them disturbing your foreground.--Peulle 15:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Ah, I see. Perhaps I'll return this summer for another shot at it.--Jjm596 17:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do, if you're in the area. :)--Peulle 12:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 15:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC))

File:Peñón_de_Ifach,_Calpe,_España,_2014-07-01,_DD_01.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Rock of Ifach, Calpe, Spain --Poco a poco 11:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, Poco a poco, but IMO for a QI the image is too unsharp (although because of atmospheric haze). --Basotxerri 20:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 18:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Poco a poco, thanks for trying but IMO this cannot be fixed (this was the reason for declining it). However, if you think that the quality is good enough, please move this to CR, perhaps others think it's good enough for a QI. --Basotxerri 20:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Ok, let's give it a try. In my opinion still a hazy picture is real to a scene. --Poco a poco 21:13, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 Support The last time I saw it, I was on my notebook. On the desktop display it looks better and is acceptable for me. I didn't think it would be possible to get the image much better than it was initially. --Basotxerri 15:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment The haze seems within known norms, however, there is a white spot/object on the left, perhaps it should be cloned out?--Peulle 08:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Not too hazy for me. All the necessary details on the peninsula can be seen. P.S. [edit conflict]: I see the white spot, too. I don't insist for it to be removed, but I'm curious to know what it is. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I've removed that white spot (I guess it was a yacht, but anyhow) and readjusted the curves and WB a bit. Poco a poco 21:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 Support--Peulle 21:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Saúde_street_market_of_weekend,_São_Paulo,_Brazil.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saúde street market --The Photographer 13:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality, strong distortion, over processing. --Rodrigo.Argenton 15:26, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your evaluation, however, I preffer another opinion --The Photographer 16:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment stitching errors have to be corrected. --Carschten 18:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Thanks --The Photographer 19:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
    Much better now. There are still some smaller issues, I added annotations. Due to them, chromatic aberration at the cables and the overprocessing look, I don't want to support, even if I can live with a promotion →  Neutral --Carschten 17:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support - Seems OK to me for a street scene. -- Ikan Kekek 09:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support OK --Sandro Halank 10:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 15:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)