Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:NGC 1672 HST.jpg

Image:NGC 1672 HST.jpg, Replaced

Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2008 at 11:47:14

Current FP — 1,280 × 919

Proposed replacement — 5,302 × 3,805

•  Info The proposed replacement is the exact same picture, only about 5 times larger (and in this case definitely five times better). I also thought that maybe since it's the same picture it'd be appropriate to just move all the assessments of the current FP to the higher res version. (Original nomination)
•  Delist or upload over the old one -- diego_pmc (talk) 11:47, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace -- Manuel R. (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
• Upload over the old one Or maybe we can upload and store lowres versions for every conceivable use ;-(. Lycaon (talk) 14:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)--
•  Delist and replace – Also the higher res picture seems to be sharper. – Jerry^teps 23:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Shouldn't you separate nominations? (Example: This would turn into this) --Mr. Mario (talk) 04:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I honestly think this would just complicate things a lot for everybody. diego_pmc (talk) 06:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, making the replacement an FP from this result isn't even the right FP procedure! --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Delist and replace. I'm not too worried about the mechanics of the procedure as long as there are enough votes. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace In that case... --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Delist and replace --Mbdortmund (talk) 01:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Question Please also mention if you agree to move all the assessments to the higher resolution version. diego_pmc (talk) 06:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Frankly if it is the same image, from the same source, but higher resolution, I would just upload it over the original and mark the existing hi-res one as a duplicate. Delisting this one and copying across the assessments is not an appropriate way to do things. If there is a suggestion that the smaller version has been processed in ways other than simple scaling then the hi-res version should be nominated for FP, and this one would only be delisted if that nomination succeeds. --Tony Wills (talk) 00:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

• See this. --Mr. Mario (talk) 02:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

That's not quite the same, that is talking about 'improved' versions of images, which always need evalution. But Commons always treats scaled down versions of images as duplicates of the original. Delist and replace as is being suggested here is a new arbitary process that is not appropriate. So I reiterate, if they are just scaled versions of the same image then the solution is simple. If there are processing differences then it is just a normal situation - nominate the new version and delist the old one if the new 'improved' one succeeds. --Tony Wills (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Delist and replace --AlexanderKlink (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Replaced -- Lycaon (talk) 18:03, 21 December 2008 (UTC)