Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Louvre 2007 02 24 c.jpg

Info Ghosts (Original nomination)
Delist --_→AzaToth 18:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I would have voted this image for FP today; the ghosts do not detract heavily from the picture. --Aqwis 19:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Woah, that's a lot ghosts. Rocket000 23:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with Aqwis. Additionally it was just elected a few month ago FP --Simonizer 13:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Aqwis. --LucaG 16:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lerdsuwa 16:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I must have slept when I supported this one, or perhaps it is because I use a better monitor now. The ghosts seem quite evident and distracting now. -- Slaunger 21:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great Picture, there should be a minimum time between promotion and first delisting request. --JDrewes 21:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree, also I think delisting a picture should be harder than featuring it. /Daniel78 00:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delist , too many ghosts. --Kjetil r 02:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Acarpentier 12:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I voted against it originally, and I still don't think it's good enough for FP, but I am voting to keep because I hate the revote type of deal (I wasn't there at the time, so let's do another vote). Dori - Talk 21:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean that only people available at the original nom, and voted then are allowed to take an image to denom vote and vote in such vote? _→AzaToth 21:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - No I mean it should be something more than just I don't like that this picture got FP and I'd like another vote. There has to be something seriously wrong with the image. Dori - Talk 17:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - The picture is filled which ghosts. _→AzaToth 18:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - I agree that it should be something serious, right now this delisting is just another round of votes. Thus an image might be delisted just because there were different people voting and not because it actually was a big problem with image. /Daniel78 23:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Seriousness is something subjective, and I believe that a high amount of ghosts are a serious issue. _→AzaToth 00:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 Delist, 8 Keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. --Simonizer 10:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu