Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Anolis marmoratus.jpg

File:Anolis marmoratus.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2010 at 06:26:24

•  Info Quality is not good enough any more for current FP standards. I have to be as strict for my own pictures as I am for others'. (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- Lycaon (talk) 06:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral Subject perfectly encyclopedic, no error photographic, simple problem of rule. Can be fair without being harsh. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist Cathy Richards (talk) 11:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep I don't see what is so bad about it. It's a bit noisy, but this can be fixed by a bit of softening. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep -- Per my general opinion on delistings. Yes, it would have failed today but it is part of FPC heritage. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
• Fishing for compliments ?  Keep, until "Commons" can feature a better one. To delist such a useful (and nice) picture is near a nonsense IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 10:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
  • It was already deemed worthy for delisting in 2007, this is almost 2011. Lycaon (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral - if it were nominated now, I would probably not support, but I don't think I would oppose. It is a nice photo. Jonathunder (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep Perfect pose and composition, not an obvious delist IMO. --Elekhh (talk) 22:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep I love the contrast Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 13:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist --McIntosh Natura (talk) 23:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist --Miguel Bugallo 22:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC). 1,92 megapixels--Miguel Bugallo 06:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist I agree with the nominator, thanks for critically evaluating your own work. "Former featured picture" is worthy credit to preserve our history. --99of9 (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Keep Nice picture, keep it, pls. --Karelj (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist The digital artefacts are a bit scary, and I think "we" may have been somewhat lenient in promoting this in the first place. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 07:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Delist Quality is rubbish. Maedin\^talk 06:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 6 keep, 2 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)