Commons:Featured picture candidates/ File:Private Michael McNamara - 5th Dragoon Guards.jpg

File:Private Michael McNamara - 5th Dragoon Guards.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2019 at 15:37:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/ File:Private Michael McNamara - 5th Dragoon Guards.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/ File:Private Michael McNamara - 5th Dragoon Guards.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Hughes & Mullins after Cundall & Howlett - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I'm touched by his brooding facial expression, and his costume is very interesting. Because this photo from 1856 is so striking, a degree of unsharpness is acceptable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not good enough despite the historical value, IMO. Back then, photographers used various techniques in order to avoid motion blur. In this case, those measures failed.--Peulle (talk) 17:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The motion blur is present here. --BoothSift 23:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

It's from 1856. It's quite good for the period, especially given the circumstances. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:11, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Small resolution, underexposed and blurry -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral I don't think this is your best restoration - not your fault, of course, but the fault of the material you had to work with. But I'm not convinced all old photographs like this should be made FP, as interesting as they are. Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support I think I judged this too harshly, the quality is OK and it's quite a well-known image. Cmao20 (talk) 06:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:15, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪🅰〒ℂ🇭🅰- 💬 19:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others -- Piotr Bart (talk) 15:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)