Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained glass windows in Church of Paróquia São Luiz Gonzaga, Avenida Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil

Stained glass windows in Church of Paróquia São Luiz Gonzaga, Avenida Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2023 at 12:41:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Sets of stained glass windows
•  Info Stained glass windows in Church of Paróquia São Luiz Gonzaga, Avenida Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Masterpiece! -- ★ 12:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Great! Yann (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Extraordinary! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:26, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks Arion --Wilfredor (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment The windows are beautiful, but I'm not as impressed as everyone who's commented so far, inclined to oppose, and don't understand the reactions, because the upper parts of the windows are notably unsharp, and I feel like the stained glass window series we've featured have been sharp throughout. Maybe someone would like to explain why this is so extraordinary as photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I have the same objections as Ikan. The quality of the photos unfortunately decreases towards the top.--Ermell (talk) 21:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Question Is this actually a valid set? following which criteria? In that church there are more than 5 windows (I had expected an even amount like 6, but I guess there are more), so why this 5? I also concur with Ikan's/Ermell's judgement Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose It does not seem to qualify as a set. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I will nominate separately. ★ 00:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment It's irregular for me to reply to a withdrawn nomination, but why will you nominate partially unsharp photos of stained glass separately? I'd suggest you reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)