Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:VanGogh-starry night.jpg

Image:VanGogh-starry night.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Thebrid - uploaded by Thebrid - nominated by Polymath618 -- Polymath618 (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Polymath618 (talk) 09:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Valuable shot. Freedom to share (talk) 15:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Question is there a tilt on the portrait itself, or is there a real counterclockwise tilt from the scan? --S23678 (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love van Gogh and this is really nice picture. But this voting should bee about photography and I don´t see any reason for nominating of reproduction of something for FP. --Karelj (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I always get this one confused with The Scream which is a similar image by a different painter. There are enough artists and photographers between here and other licensed to be free internet locations that it seems a waste to feature old or NASA artists. Also, how does anyone know if the colors are correct? -- carol (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - This is a valuable historical image, and has already been featured on the Turkish Wikipedia, so they apparently considered it good enough. I think it deserves a feature.--Eagle01 (talk) 00:09, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  • User has only 5 edits this one being the fifth. Muhammad 09:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
    • And this is important because? If you're accusing him of something just say it. --Calibas (talk) 02:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
      • I'm not accusing, just pointing out to the closer. --Muhammad 08:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
        • That doesn't matter, as on Commons we count votes (not the same as on en.Wikipedia). --MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support An excellent, historically valuable image. Wonderful. --Simba123 (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment This FP and maybe one or two others should not be closed without reference to the project CheckUsers. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please note I have struck the votes of three users on this page. There is evidence to suggest that there is abuse of multiple accounts and that the three are linked & operating together. I suggest other votes that they have cast should be subject to review. If anyone requires further information please contact a project CheckUser - all active CUs have been informed of this. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose unless someone can explain me if there's a reason for the tilt. --S23678 (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose no geolocation, nominated by subsequently-blocked user, nothing special about this reproduction -- Korax1214 (talk) 01:58, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 11:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)