Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Nyc10795u.jpg

Image:Nyc10795u.jpg, featured

•  Info created by Detroit Publishing Co., 1905 - uploaded and nominated by trialsanderrors (talk) ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- trialsanderrors (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I like it--Mbz1 (talk) 16:00, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Econt (talk) 00:09, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Haven't seen such an old picture with such great sharpness and resolution. Would be nice to clone out the text at the bottom though. --Calibas (talk) 01:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Problematic licence. --Karelj (talk) 20:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
  •  Question How so? The copyright appears to have expired. --Calibas (talk) 22:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose High quality for an old picture, but the subject and composition gets no wow from me. --S23678 (talk) 12:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Info There is watermark at the bottom, including copyright notice. Crapload (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting historical document of good technical quality. The text at the bottom is integral part of the document, so certainly do not remove it! License problem? Maybe, but probably not. If the name of the photographer is known, the work is copyrighted till 70 years after his dead. Otherwise, one can assume that a picture of more than 100 years old belongs to the public domain. As long as the photographer is not known and it isn't proved that somebody has some rights on that picture, it can be considered as public domain. -- MJJR (talk) 20:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
  • The text isn't an integral part, it was added by the library. There's a call number on it. --Calibas (talk) 04:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing quality (sharp, low noise, no tilt, good exposure etc.) and attractive overall. The thumbnail doesn't do it justice. Benh (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting and valuable, but I don't like the caption. --Dori - Talk 03:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose as S23678. Lycaon (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support looks good considering the age. --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 16:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Really sharp at high resolution. A beautiful old image.--Paloma Walker (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful, but should not have a caption. Finavon (talk) 10:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Such a nice old quality picture, really cool to see. /Daniel78 (talk) 21:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 09:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)