Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hot Springs of Pamukkale Turkey.jpg

Image:Hot Springs of Pamukkale Turkey.jpg, featured

For comparison, how it really looks alike.

•  Info A hanging w:limestone walls and w:hot springs at Pamukkale
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 16:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 16:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 17:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Calibas 21:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Althought i think the sky is over edited --Evilarry 21:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose It doesnt show the pools. A higher view would be thousend times better. --Niabot 06:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

• Cannot agree with your oppose reason. Pamukkale is a beautiful place and all views are interesting. Higher view would have been better in order to show the pools, but worse in order to show limestone details as it is clearly seen from the image, which is offered for the comparaison. Thanks.--Mbz1 13:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Question Why is the sky so dark ? Benh 06:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

• to see the limestone better. You want to oppose the image because of the sky? Please feel free. At least it is a better reason than "does not show the pools." Thanks.--Mbz1 13:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

No, actually, I want to support. But the sky is so dark I wondered if that pic wasn't overprocessed. Benh 15:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

It might have been. I'm a bad photographer and even worse with photo shops.--Mbz1 15:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Support the 5th and promoting vote :). I'm not very good either at processing pic, but would you mind giving me the original ? I'd like to see what I can do. Benh 06:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• Thank you very much for offering your help, Benh. Here's the link to the original Image:Hot springs of Pamukkale origibal.JPG--Mbz1 (talk) 13:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

OOps, sorry for missing the link. I'll be away for 2 weeks from tonight... I'll give it a try when I come back. Benh (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment If somebody wants to give it a try with the original, please let me know and I'll upload one.--Mbz1 13:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured Simonizer (talk) 10:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit 1, not featured

•  Support
•  Comment What happened to the bottom of Edit 1? It looks like a hasty cloning job. Thegreenj 03:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
  • That's better. Thegreenj 03:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• Thank you, but the question is, if it better enough to support :=) --Mbz1 03:50, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• Hmmm... Good composition, but poor sharpness and borderline size →  Neutral Thegreenj 04:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• Cannot agree, but whatever one Pamukkale more, one less who cares?--Mbz1 04:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Support nice. —αἰτίας •discussion• 01:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 11:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)