Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cyanistes caeruleus 3 Luc Viatour.jpg

Image:Cyanistes caeruleus 3 Luc Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2008 at 05:44:10

•  Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 05:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 05:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support toll --Böhringer (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Twdragon (talk) 09:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Well done!!! -- Tobi 87 (talk) 09:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral I don't agree with the crop here. The bird should be centered since it's a square composition. As it is it's neither centered nor rule of thirds. --Dori - Talk 12:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Le sens du regard va vers la gauche en direction du bas. Il est pour moi très esthétique et dans les règles de dégager le sens du regard même dans un format carré. De plus le regard a un inclinaison parallèle a la branche ce qui renforce la composition! --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

"The eye travels towards the left and bottom. It is for me very aesthetic and within the rules to free the eye even within a square format. Additionally, the eye's path is parallel to the the branch which reinforces the composition." not the best translation but should get the meaning across ... ianaré (talk) 14:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

thank you for the translation;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I got the gist of the wording (mais je ne peux pas parler tres bien). I still say that if it's not dead center, it should be in the third's line and not in a square format. --Dori - Talk 23:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Good! Mr. Mario (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good. Agree with the nominator on the merits of the composition -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support could be a little sharper but has a great composition. ianaré (talk) 14:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Bellisimo, nice bird! --Ca0572 (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --D-Kuru (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Simonizer (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Javier ME (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- DarkAp89  Commons 11:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Question is the white aura underlining OK, if there is no light context due to the two layered image used?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 22:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

c'est une image en contre jour. Le soleil donne sur le devant de l'oiseau. Je travaille en raw pour déboucher les parties sombres du contre-jour.--Luc Viatour (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I see. Could you provide this information in image descrtiption?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 08:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Information ajoutée en français --Luc Viatour (talk) 08:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, now someone can translate it to English and it would be perfect.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 10:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Info - Here it is the translation: It's an image in "contre-jour" (against the light). The sun is lightening the front of the bird. I work with "raw" to lighten the darker parts of the "contre-jour" -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:24, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Thank you!--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support well, now when the aura is explained, I can support it.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 20:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, nicely composed, but no part of this image is sharp (compare to almost any image by Mdf) and it is badly lit. Tomfriedel (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Caspian blue (talk) 02:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

result: 16 supports, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Benh (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)