Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xanten RömerMuseum 2.jpg

File:Xanten RömerMuseum 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2016 at 21:43:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Xanten RömerMuseum 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Xanten RömerMuseum 2.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
•  Info created by Till Niermann - uploaded by Till Niermann - nominated by W.carter -- w.carter-Talk 21:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- w.carter-Talk 21:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, simply amazing and I can feel the geometric art here --The Photographer (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 21:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per The Photographer. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
• Nice view, interesting light conditions. But it looks a bit to dark and underexposed for me. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Very interesting composition but a bit too dark -- Spurzem (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Info Upped the light a little bit per requests and cloned out the partial bird/UFO while I was at it. If Till Niermann don't agree with this, then I apologize and you can of course reverse it. The change was so very little that I did not see the need for a new version. We already have one alt version, no need for three since the change was suggested by two editor and I agree with it. If I was wrong in doing so, please let me know. w.carter-Talk 11:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Info Thanks for optimizing, I'm far from opposing the enhancements. --Till (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
    • That was reassuring, thanks for letting me know. If you want to vote for your own picture, you can do so if you like. w.carter-Talk 18:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me both are too dark. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition! The editor of a photo calendar would probably prefer the de-molehilled version below, but the more I think about it the more I like this version, as they somehow break the otherwise strictly geometrical patterns in the image. --El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Also kind of reminds me of "Der Maulwurf Grabowski": a picture book I had when I was a child, telling the story of a mole who has to find a new place to live because people are turning his meadow into a construction site …
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 14:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alexmar983 (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Great use of abstraction -- Thennicke (talk) 15:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me both are too dark, as King of hearts. Oversaturated IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 02:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Just FYI, the saturation was never touched. --Till (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Alt version

•  Info Fixed black UFO, sharpening problems, noise and severals distracting objects like irregular lawn. --The Photographer (talk) 03:26, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - The only difference I see is that clods of dirt on the grass were cloned out, but those don't bother me. I won't oppose this, though; it's fine, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support move to  Neutral on this for less confusion now that the UFO is gone on the first. - Thanks for fixing the UFO (or part of bird top center on the other pic) and the noise. The lawn did not bother me in the original version, looks like they have a problem with some rodents or other animals digging there, but that is part of the landscape. I'm fine with either version. w.carter-Talk 09:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me both are too dark. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:42, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer the original. INeverCry 06:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Alexmar983 (talk) 22:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me both are too dark, as King of hearts. Oversaturated IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 02:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 15:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 20:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany

The chosen alternative is: File:Xanten RömerMuseum 2.jpg