Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw- Most Zwierzyniecki.jpg

File:Wroclaw- Most Zwierzyniecki.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2020 at 22:13:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw- Most Zwierzyniecki.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wroclaw- Most Zwierzyniecki.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Poland
•  Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but with the left cut off the nice line created by the tracks just doesn't lead anywhere. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support It leads across the bridge. Strong sense of motion to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice view, but would expect a little bit of the left arch of the bridge. --XRay ^talk 08:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per King --StellarHalo (talk) 05:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan Kekek, the leading lines are actually really good. Too much NR for me, but still deserves the star. Cmao20 (talk) 06:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition not working for me. -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin. A QI yes, but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support The composition with regard to the bridge works well. The starburst from the lanterns is a little distracting, but doesn't really clash with the curves of the bridge, so I think it's acceptable. The motion blur of the vehicle (bus) in the far distance is not ideal, but very small in the scene. And the advert which says "BAR" is not ideal, but somewhat mitigated by the fact its bleached by specular light. Overall, though, the sweeping curves of the bridge side and top save the scene, and the exposure and colours are just right for drawing attention to them. --Bobulous (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)