Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden Entrance Door, Palácio da Pena.jpg

File:Wooden Entrance Door, Palácio da Pena.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2021 at 18:05:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden Entrance Door, Palácio da Pena.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden Entrance Door, Palácio da Pena.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
•  Info created by Y.ssk - uploaded by Y.ssk - nominated by Y.ssk -- Y.ssk (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Y.ssk (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Question Am I missing something? A door? Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• What't the problem with it? —capmo (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Weak support I like the colours and the geometrical lines, but I'd prefer if the picture had a higher pixel size, capturing more details of the subject. —capmo (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support Yes, a door, but a very nice one ;–). A good catch! For a smartphone the quality is very decent. It’s just that ever so slightly exaggerated sharpening/contrast and the tilt at the bottom which make me hesitate to give full support. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review Aristeas! I've dialled back the sharpening and contrast in a new version. Y.ssk (talk) 13:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality, but just an old door. I can't see anything outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 12:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Milseburg, it is just a door and I don’t think it should be a featured picture. Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The image has a noticeable character. I like the color contrasts and the geometric balance; and for a cell phone shot, the quality is okay. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice door, but as a composition, it leaves me flat. Likely to be a good VI nomination, regardless of the results of this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Commonists 22:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose I get the same impression as the other people who said oppose. SHB2000 (talk) 04:45, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support That worked for me. IMO the door of a historical castle belonging to the middle of the 1800s is a valid subject. the colors are interesting, especially the yellow stripe around it. --IamMM (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I should clarify that I agree that a door can be a featurable subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I like the combination of shapes and lines here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Like the others, I can't see the big wow either. In 2021, I think this kind of subject should have a higher technical quality to be called one of the finest images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 10:57, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting door but no wow in my eyes.--Ermell (talk) 18:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose reluctantly per others citing no wow. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)