Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter Landscape with Brabrand Church.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Winter Landscape with Brabrand Church.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2017 at 19:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Landscape
Info In this sunny June weather, here's a lovely winter landscape painting to cool you down. Painting by Christian David Gebauer. Photo all by me. -- Colin (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)- Support -- of course -- --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support - what Christmas cards are made of...Atsme 📞 20:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Looks like Currier and Ives PumpkinSky talk 20:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:55, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Love those old days! Jee 03:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 04:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- edges are seen on left and right side. --Mile (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- None of the frame is visible. There is nothing more to trim without losing painting. -- Colin (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- It could be some shadow from the frame, that is often a problem at museums. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see a way to avoid this without removing the painting from the frame. It isn't imo intrusive as the painting is quite dark. If our artwork experts think it is fine to trim a pixel off the left and right, then I can do that, otherwise I'd prefer to show as much of the painting as possible. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- To me it is good as it is. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see a way to avoid this without removing the painting from the frame. It isn't imo intrusive as the painting is quite dark. If our artwork experts think it is fine to trim a pixel off the left and right, then I can do that, otherwise I'd prefer to show as much of the painting as possible. -- Colin (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- It could be some shadow from the frame, that is often a problem at museums. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- None of the frame is visible. There is nothing more to trim without losing painting. -- Colin (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Nice cooling motif. It is captured very well so that you can see the brush strokes but they are not lighted in a way that disturbs the painting. Knowing how meticulous you are, I have no doubt the WB and color correspond with the original even, if they are a bit different from the other photos of this painting. --cart-Talk 09:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Good work, you can even see the cracks in the paint.--Peulle (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daphne Lantier 18:35, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Daphne Lantier 23:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Landscape
