Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien, Volksgarten, Theseustempel -- 2018 -- 3128.jpg

File:Wien, Volksgarten, Theseustempel -- 2018 -- 3128.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2018 at 08:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wien, Volksgarten, Theseustempel -- 2018 -- 3128.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wien, Volksgarten, Theseustempel -- 2018 -- 3128.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Austria
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 08:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 08:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Eye-catching -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:41, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support First thought through my mind wasn't "wow", it was "Hot damn!". Amazing shot, XRay. However, the pillars are slightly overexposed. I'd give a full support if that can be fixed! -- GerifalteDelSabana (talk) 13:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

• GerifalteDelSabana, please don't use the 'weak', 'strong' or any other fancy templates when voting since FPCBot can't read those. Use only {{s}} or {{o}} with the piping. I have fixed that for you in this vote. --Cart (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks for your advice. It's fixed now. --XRay ^talk 13:44, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support A pleasing abstraction. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Daniel. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Good but not great to me, maybe because we don't see the tops of the pillars. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but IMO the composition does not work with the top of the pillars (and the roof and the sky). --XRay ^talk 08:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Ikan. --Karelj (talk) 15:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMHO the perspective is wrong. You can see the columuns are conical but the shape of the partly visible columns left and right are parallel to the border. Also in consequence of this the left and the right of the completly visible columns are leaning to the center. --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC) --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Fixed @Berthold Werner: You're right. It's fixed now. :-) Hopefully that was the only reason for a contra vote. --XRay ^talk 09:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Jee 13:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Could work well as B&W, too. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I'll try it within the next days. Thanks. --XRay ^talk 11:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support - pleasing symmetry (apart from that wall's edge on the left side -- ask them to rebuild it plz :) ), and the bright white columns in front of the light gradient on the wall behind them makes it pop. IMO it would be better with a little more of the columns on the edges or with them cropped out completely, but we're a little late in the nom for edits anyway. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry. After fixing the verticals there another crop with more columns isn't possible. --XRay ^talk 11:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Austria