Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White noise - Horn loudspeakers at Brastad soccer arena.jpg

File:White noise - Horn loudspeakers at Brastad soccer arena.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2018 at 18:18:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:White noise - Horn loudspeakers at Brastad soccer arena.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:White noise - Horn loudspeakers at Brastad soccer arena.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info Always wanting to explore things that are normally frowned upon, I think I've found a subject where an overcast sky actually adds to the composition. -- Cart (talk) 18:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cart (talk) 18:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Maybe a useful VI, but I don't get what you found compelling about the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support – While those horns aren't anything super gorgeous, these ordinary infrastructure elements can definitely make for a somehow interesting composition. --Msaynevirta (talk) 22:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose An interesting idea, but I think it might have worked better if you had had just the speakers ... the tower has different forms that sort of clash with the curvilinearity and gradients of the horns. Also, you need to rename it to eliminate the superfluous "r" in "loudspearkers", and there's a bit of CA on the rims, too. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• Fixed Title and CA fixed. Thanks for noticing that. --Cart (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Uhm, no. Sky is uniform grey and dull and I cannot see a subiect. And if there is a sublejct it is not enough WOW or interesting to me, IMO.Paolobon140 (talk) 14:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• Any non-uniform sky would just make the whole thing messy. Of course the subject is the horns. As usual I make compos of everyday objects, for me their forms and colors are just as photographically interesting as art objects. I like all the shades of white in the image. --Cart (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• I understand your point ov view, but im sure you have much more WOW pics in your archive. Why choose such a difficult subject? A question might be: would you ever print this pic and hang it on your living-room wall?:-)Paolobon140 (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• I think it would make a rather cool canvas in a hallway or an office. I don't confine art to a living room and neither should Commons. Imagine this in the reception of a sound studio. :) It's true that I could do just easy pretty subject, but where is the fun and challange in that? The Wikimedia project needs good photos of all kinds of things not just pretty flowers, churches and birds on twigs. I chose dificult subjects because almost no-one else does. --Cart (talk) 15:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

•  Support For me, this is a balanced image with a refined background. It fits perfectly in the interior of offices of certain companies. In my opinion, Cart is looking for other ways that sometimes evoke resistance. I think that's courageous.--Famberhorst (talk) 08:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not very interesting subject, the white background is ugly in my view, and a bit depressing too -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not see any reason for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 22:43, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral a bit of CA but I like the composition, however, the overcast sky does not appease my sensory receptors imho. :p ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 02:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Ah well, I think it's time to put this one out of its misery. ;) --Cart (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)