Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg

File:Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2016 at 04:31:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Western entrance of Pasupatinath Temple, Front Gate-IMG 3466.jpg

1154

178

4018

2620

5184

3330

crop suggestion. This way, the foreground would feel much less "heavy", and the background buildings show their interesting parts. --Kreuzschnabel 15:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - I really don't want to oppose this nomination, so I'll leave some comments. First, I greatly respect the thought that went into this composition, but there's a lot going on in this picture, and I think the crops on the the left and right are too close. Second, the focus is a little too soft in parts of the picture for me to feel wowed. Third, I completely understand wanting to avoid glary light, but I find this light a bit duller than optimal. But lastly, I just want to say again that I respect your artistry and sensibility, and I would really like to see more and different photos of this motif from you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
  @Ikan Kekek Thanks for ur comment. New version file is uploaded with bit brighten up and some other correctment.Plz review. Thanks again.. Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 05:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - It's not a really big change. I don't think you can change the photo enough for me to support a feature. I think that would require taking a new photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment --Ok next time when i visit there..-- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 06:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Pleeeeease, no version mixups during voting period. We do not improve images here, we do judge results. Thank you. --Kreuzschnabel 15:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose some way from FP. Charles (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose for composition, foreground is too dominating for me, pushing the interesting buildings far away. Crop suggestion added. --Kreuzschnabel 15:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Strange composition --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel and Uoaei1. The composition is appropriate to a tourist snapshot, not an FP. The staircases in the foreground clash very strongly with the putative subject. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 00:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 08:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)