Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wegerich - Scheckenfalter auf Kamille.jpg

File:Wegerich - Scheckenfalter auf Kamille.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2019 at 20:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wegerich - Scheckenfalter auf Kamille.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wegerich - Scheckenfalter auf Kamille.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
•  Info created - uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) - ^{ping me} 21:03, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Great picture of the butterfly, once again. I think the category for the flower should be added. The blurred petals in the foreground are unfortunate because they're a bit obtrusive, but they're unavoidable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A pity about the missing EXIF, the image detail is great Poco² 23:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 04:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --BoothSift 04:40, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 07:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Wow, the detail on the butterfly is excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great. I would have welcomed EXIF data, too (I am curious which camera/lens/aperture/ISO was used) … --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 12:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per others. --Podzemnik (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support But how did you get this uniform bokeh and an a smilar bokeh in your other nomination? Is it a studio shot? I also miss the EXIF data. --Llez (talk) 06:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

• This is a concern with a nomination of an image by a photographer not active on Wikipedia. Some photographers use painted backgrounds for these shots. I don't know if that was done here or in the other live nomination. It's not a 'studio-shot' technique I use, but it does produce an appealing background. I certainly can't achieve this type of background by natural means. If it is a computer-generated background I would oppose it right away. Perhaps Christian Ferrer can get clarification? I think voters are entitled to know (like with a photo-stacked or stitched image). Charles (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

• No more than you. I found the images by chance, do as you see fit. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

For what my opinion is worth, it is very unlikely that it is a computer-assembled image, indeed there is too much fine details on the butterfly, a photo montage would have affected at one time or another the details. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Amazing. -- -donald- (talk) 06:40, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 22:07, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 01:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:18, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 15:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Lucas 22:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera