Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg

File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2016 at 18:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info created and uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. I like the monument and the sense of vertical motion in the photograph, but the crops on the left and right are a lot tighter than I'd prefer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
  • @Ikan Kekek: For me, tighter crop is a sign of less disturbing elements in this case. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
    •  Question - What would be in the picture if there were just a bit more space to the left and right of the monument that would bother you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
      • @Ikan Kekek: Depending on the space, someone cut element for example. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
        •  Comment - Aren't you describing a tighter crop that actually cuts off part of the monument? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crops on all sides are too tight for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per KoH. INeverCry 23:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment The crops tight is because have spotlights, have another spotlights like exists in this image in boths sides. look in maps: Google Maps --Webysther (talk) 01:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Right here: Google Maps Street View Image -- Webysther (talk) 10:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Focusing on the main subjekt is ok. for me. The presentation of details is verry good. --Milseburg (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not bothered by the crops. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)