Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Water Drop Before It Hits The Water.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Water Drop Before It Hits The Water.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2018 at 03:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
- Info created by Skitterphoto - uploaded by Boothsift - nominated by Boothsift -- Boothsift (talk) 03:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Boothsift (talk) 03:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Support - Small, but I think that's OK for a picture of a drop of water. And it's cool.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)- Oppose Low resolution and at full size the drop is not sharp enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Done with fixing the resolution and making drop sharper.--Boothsift (talk) 04:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- It seems to me that this new version has been upscaled from the previous. Pixels and artifacts are now visible. You should revert now. If you have a higher resolution, please upload it from the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: I already did that. --Boothsift (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Done with fixing the resolution and making drop sharper.--Boothsift (talk) 04:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Please elaborate. --Boothsift (talk) 06:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Like Basile said, not enough of it is in focus. Daniel Case (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: Please elaborate. --Boothsift (talk) 06:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- I've reconsidered. I'm not feeling wowed anymore, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Why?--Boothsift (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- It looked better when it was downsized, thus serving as a perfect example of why downsizing an image to make it look sharper - or, as in this case, less noisy - is against QI/FP rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Why?--Boothsift (talk) 06:47, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. In short, this is not an FP. This is.--Peulle (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It is a random image downloaded from a free-photos site with a max download size at 2652 x 1832 px, if you don't have access to the original raw file, it is quite meaningless to upsize the jpeg and try to make it sharper. You simply do not have the image file information needed for this and make it FP. --Cart (talk) 08:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boothsift (talk • contribs)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)