Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 03 2014.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Wasserbahnhof Mülheim Morgen 03 2014.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2014 at 07:59:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Wasserbahnhof located at river Ruhr in Mülheim photographed at morning light with some fog in the background
all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)- Weak
Oppose It is a nice picture and a good QI. I find the sky is boring, the reflection in the water is very nice, the main subject in itself I find not very interesting. The fraction of the image used for the water surface is perhaps a bit too large for my taste. Overall a little dark. Composition is good but not quite spot on. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your detailed comment, Slaunger. I for myself find the object very intersting. The building with its architecture, position directly at the water and its function is very unique. The German Wikipedia article Wasserbahnhof, an approximate translation is Water Station, directly points to the building shown here - also very unique. In combination with the nice reflections (the reasons why I cannot crop more of the water) and the morning light I find the photo good enough to nominate it here. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand the boundary conditions, and I certainly agree it is good enough to nominate. It just does not feel spot on from a compositional point of view for me. I see other reviewers have another opinion, and that is just fine. -- Slaunger (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your detailed comment, Slaunger. I for myself find the object very intersting. The building with its architecture, position directly at the water and its function is very unique. The German Wikipedia article Wasserbahnhof, an approximate translation is Water Station, directly points to the building shown here - also very unique. In combination with the nice reflections (the reasons why I cannot crop more of the water) and the morning light I find the photo good enough to nominate it here. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Comment A bit dark. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Done, King of Hearts, I've slightly increased brightness and shadows parts. Please keep in mind that this is an early morning shot with early morning light, no midday. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:41, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 00:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 18:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Halavar (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose QI, but for sure not a FP. Object is IMO n.th. special. A regular house with a small pavilion roof used as water station. Despite of ISO 125 the sensor seem to be overburden: the noise performance isn't really good and sharpness is poorly (f/5,6 isn't best choise here). The scrub in the lower right corner is disturbing. Overall impression is borgin. --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I cannot see why the sensor is overburden. "Sharpness is poor" - pardon? Do we see the same image? You can even read the very small letter on the signs at the building. Sharpness at the farer parts cannot be better due to morning fog. Don't expect sharpness as it is on a midday shot. I have indeed though a lot about the scrub at the right corner. It is no problem to remove it. But finally I deciced to keep it because it is a nice framing and it is a good opposite to the trees at the top left.
Confirmed results:
