Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Warm front.svg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Warm front.svg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2015 at 23:28:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by Kelvinsong—♥ Kelvinsong talk 23:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Support—Seriously? 6 supports & no opposes? Really getting tired of this fail-because-people-dont-bother-to-vote thing—♥ Kelvinsong talk 23:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)- Support It's one thing if people widely oppose something you think is great, but it's quite another if no one even bothers to comment. But it does seem to happen a lot. -- Ram-Man 23:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support If I had seen the previous nomination, I would support it and the image would be FP. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I start the proposed rule for FPC. "If a nomination ends with 6 votes for support and no votes for oppose, the nominator can, automatically after the ending, renominate the file". @Kelvinsong: you support the proposal? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks!! && commented there—♥ Kelvinsong talk 15:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- And I start the proposed rule for FPC. "If a nomination ends with 6 votes for support and no votes for oppose, the nominator can, automatically after the ending, renominate the file". @Kelvinsong: you support the proposal? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
{{O}}, invalid SVG, andI don't get what it's trying to illustrate. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC) updated Be..anyone (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Be..anyone: Fixed the error—better now? && It’s supposed to be a warm front, the thing on weather maps with the red half-circles. I based the picture off this image—♥ Kelvinsong talk 15:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support, but it's not easy to read, a lot of stuff in there and things like the temperature profile are quite hidden. Don't have a great idea for improvement though. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Meh. (Aside: the SVG does not render all annotations in Firefox and the colours are very saturated in Chrome -- One is left wondering what is so great about SVG if it doesn't not reliably render graphics). -- Colin (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- This image is far from "meh" in my opinion and that is a really bad way to put it. I use Chrome, and the colors are far from oversaturated. Dustin (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- This is for Featured Pictures. We have QI for straightforward diagrams. This one is confusing and just Google for "warm front" gives better diagrams. My "meh" point is that this image failed the last time because everyone just went "meh" without voting and the nominator has confused this "lack of support" with "can't be bothered to support". We don't just keep nominating till we get the result we like. -- Colin (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- This image is far from "meh" in my opinion and that is a really bad way to put it. I use Chrome, and the colors are far from oversaturated. Dustin (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why I thought (also in the 1st run) that this SVG tries to explain "inversion" and which cloud formations could indicate the peculiar weather condition; good to know that the sources and your SVG never tried this, and therefore also can't fail. For other meteorological concepts I pass, I have no clue about it. –Be..anyone (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
~
I withdraw my nomination—This is getting out of hand and really the star isn’t worth the drama.—♥ Kelvinsong talk 04:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
