Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wall Graffiti Bangalore.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Wall Graffiti Bangalore.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2021 at 06:48:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info All by me -- Dey.sandip (talk) 06:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Dey.sandip (talk) 06:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting composition, unfortunately 1/160 s was a bit too long to freeze the walker. The difference in sharpness with the background is explicit. The cables and rubble on the ground are distracting for me. Although one can see these wires as an extension of the painting, they're also kind of ugly in themselves -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- The wires are part of the graffiti. They are restraining the vehicle from running over the scared looking figure below -- Dey.sandip (talk) 13:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- "Wires", I'm talking about those on the ground. Real wires, not painted -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- I like the photo. Whether it's right for FP, I don't know. My question is whether this is COM:GRAFFITI or COM:MURAL (not all of it appears to be in the frame), given COM:FOP India. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a graffiti on a public wall by a public road. I don't much about the COM:FOP India, so whatever is decided based on that is OK with me -- Dey.sandip (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support Weak because the walker is blurred, otherwise good composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support I have proposed another gallery link: IMHO this would fit better into the “Frescos and murals” section than into the “Places” gallery. (We have no “Graffiti” gallery, therefore this does not mean a decision regarding the question whether this is COM:GRAFFITI or COM:MURAL ;–).) --Aristeas (talk) 08:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Well-done, deservedly a QI and a good VI candidate, but like Rhododendrites I don't see an FP here. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results: