Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waischenfeld Altes Rathaus 2173774.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Waischenfeld Altes Rathaus 2173774.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 May 2019 at 21:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info Old Town Hall in Waischenfeld at the river Wiesent. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I'll open up the voting. I think the crops could be quibbled with, but I like the building that's the main subject, the reflections, the cheery light and colors and the peaceful feeling. There are also some nice shapes like the spiral staircase. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I improved the crop a bit. Thanks for your support.--Ermell (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan, looks great to me. Cmao20 (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan and Cmao20. --Cayambe (talk) 07:14, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A 💬 15:01, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose: too ordinary house (for me as a Bavarian), with a flagpole interfering, in nondescript light. The reflection doesn't contribute enough wow for me unfortunately. – Lucas 20:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose The house is pretty ordinary IMO, it doesn't stand out. --BoothSift 22:49, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lucas. -- B2Belgium (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good for me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 21:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose As much as I like water-reflection pictures, in this one the reflection is something of a distraction, and while I can't really see cropping it any other way it still feels too tight. Daniel Case (talk) 00:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. Vulphere 14:13, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Support The vivid red beams of the timber frame house are highly impressive, contrasting nicely with the cream background. This a true rendition of the old town hall's current surroundings. Sure, to the right we see a modern spiral staircase, in the background an unattractive, but not unobtrusive modern building, also a flagpole and works of modern art. To the left a visibly aged building, also freshly painted and with a steep tiled roof. This stark contrast of historical versus modern is often unavoidable nowadays, and is certainly better than creating a faux "true historical" scene by removing all modern features with the aid of an image editing programme. Thumbs up for the upper half of the image. But, as I just verified, it is lacking something special when the reflection in the lower half is covered up. It is the fourway combination of old versus new / direct view versus reflection that catches the eye. And, extra point for Ermell, this image is technically impeccable. A supplementary note from the fine arts: as every artist knows, when contemplating a painting one should turn it upside down (if permitted, of course) to see whether it is still balanced in colour and composition when upended. I did a vertical flip with this image and viewed it at maximum detail - it passed the test. Yes, I like it. Franz van Duns (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - Does every artist know that, about flipping a painting? I have yet to hear that told to me or discussed by any of the hundreds of painters I know, including my father. I would question that, too - I think paintings are meant to be judged only right side up - but I'm curious to know if you have a convenient source for someone well-known who made that assertion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, I have also heard the "look at the painting in a mirror". There are plenty of art tips that include both. [1], [2], [3], [4]. The idea is to free your mind from what you have painted and look at it with new eyes as if you haven't seen it before. Seeing it from another way, you see only lines and composition, not the object(s) in the painting. It's a version of the very old trick when you learn to paint or draw, to copy other images upside down so your brain will not get stuck in preconditioned ways. Another way is to draw the empty space between objects instead of the objects themselves. There are a number of these ways to see things in a new light. A really good painting will stand all these tests. --Cart (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Cart, thanks for the links and remarks. At least one of those folks has real credentials, though for my own edification, I think I may ask my artist friends what they think of this idea and see if they agree. I think that concentrating on the empty space between objects and what shapes it makes is absolutely classic and has a lot to do with how still life painters set up their still life objects, so the idea of concentrating on the empty space in a drawing does sound like something any number of my artist friends could talk about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, Ikan, very much for your spontaneous discussion, and Cart for the provided links. My background: when attending university some 35 years ago I took a series of courses in oil painting, engraving, and photography throughout my stay both to broaden my knowledge of the arts in general and to balance my studies for my more mathematically centred main subject. One of our tutors' shared mantras, himself a skilled artist (died 2004, see this link (in German)), was that one should turn / mirror / flip one's painting, etching, or sketch ever so often during the creative process and it should appeal to the eye in every orientation. Also squinting your eyes to obscure the details and thus view mainly the balance of colours and of tonality is often very helpful. Even our then photography tutor agreed that a photographer with artistical aspirations will instinctively reflect on the same procedures either at the moment of shooting an image or later on during cropping. Of course this does not apply rigorously to mainly photographical reproductions, but even these may be aesthetically pleasing when well-balanced in the above respect. I do hope that this explanation is satisfactory for you. Franz van Duns (talk) 08:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
- Sure it does. I can always stand to learn new things. I do know about squinting. I remember seeing my father do that a lot. Thanks for taking the time to explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture #Germany