Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg

File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2018 at 21:21:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wachtküppel (Nordwestansicht).jpg

736

48

8516

3954

9268

4803

crop suggestion

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info The Wachtküppel in the Rhön Mountains seen from northwest, seen in winter 2017/18. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 21:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment a bit underexposed? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

I was told in the QI review to spend more light and I have done so. Possible to give further more. But I don´t know if it's really required. Other fast opinions? I get offline for the next week. --Milseburg (talk) 10:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I find it a bit unbalanced with too much uninteresting snow at the bottom, crop suggestion added. To sort of maintain the image proportions, a bit on the left could be skipped.  Oppose until fixed, please ping me if it's done. Enough change to strike 'o' but not enough to support. --cart-Talk 17:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cart's crop would help, but overall this just seems too ordinary for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like this image and the light, but also would propose to use Cart's crop and slightly increase the exposure (maybe by 1/2 step) --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Uoaei1 --Llez (talk) 11:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose, more or less per Daniel. I might well support it if the suggested crop is done, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Info Sorry for having been absent. I was busy by other work. I really appreciate the advices and made a new upload. I lightened it a bit and cut away some foreground. I strived now for a aspect ratio of 16:9. If this aspect is incidental, I could make the image longer as proposed and take away more foreground. I´m a bit insecure about this, since some people don´t like noncommon aspect ratios leading to long images.--Milseburg (talk) 16:59, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural