Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 67-71 PAN.jpg

File:Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 67-71 PAN.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2016 at 13:04:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 67-71 PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 67-71 PAN.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Panoramic view of the city of Tbilisi, capital of Georgia from Narikala. Poco² 13:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 13:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

• Poc decrease highlights, or even -0.3 EV. Try. --Mile (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - To me, this is fine as is. The highlights are bright, but I don't think they're blown. By the way, those tubular structures - huge statues, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mile and I added some notes, but the biggest problem is imho lacking of sharpness on the right side. Also midday light is not very appealing here. --Ivar (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
  •  Neutral It's better (one stitching error is still there though), but sharpness on the right is not good enough for me to support. --Ivar (talk) 07:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I saw that lack of sharpness, but I accept it as being farther away and probably also a product of smog. But that addresses only part of your critique. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment  New version uploaded where I addressed all pointed out issues Poco² 20:04, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Midday light is good for superwide panos as it avoids getting the sun in the frame. In any case, the saturation has not been severely impaired by the lighting conditions. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
• first of all just my  Comment: very nice view of Tiflis, but the image doesn't look really sharp to me in 100% view. With a Canon EOS 5DS R this should succeed better. Poco: if you manage to make this pano sharper I'll really would like to support it. --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

  Wladyslaw: Not sure what you mean with make it sharper. I've just increased sharpness. Apart from that I can offer other options like this or this. Poco² 20:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose The lighting is too strong/harsh, especially toward the middle, where the white buildings seem a bit lacking in detail and separation from each other. lNeverCry 08:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

  INeverCry, I addressed it in the current version. It is indeed difficult to satisfy everybody with a long panorama... Poco² 20:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

• Agree, light in the middle is still too strong. I think could be -light, -saturation. It can be solved. --Mile (talk) 11:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

  Mile: there is a new version...Poco² 20:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I will stay absent here. Not so FP as more VI. Light is still problem for me.--Mile (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not perfect, but hits the target more often than not. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per other discussions above it looks good to me -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment As Mile says, the lighting just doesn't work for me. This will have to be one of the very few images of yours that I'll have to stay with an oppose on, Diego. This just doesn't have the usual magic that I'm used to with your work. lNeverCry 10:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

  INeverCry, no problem with that, I neve take it personal. Overall I've to agree that my camera can provide higher quality than the result here but, after sticthing 5 images with 50 MPx each, I still think that the result is overall acceptable. Regarding lighting I have a different opinion. The spot where I was standing is possibly the best one to take a panorama of Tbilisi and the sun was IMHO at the right side Poco² 10:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose per INeverCry (lighting, sharpness) Je-str (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light burst on the right side -- Zcebeci (talk) 06:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)