Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Oporto desde Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 08-28 HDR PAN.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Vista de Oporto desde Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, 2019-06-02, DD 08-28 HDR PAN.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2019 at 18:41:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info View of rabelo boats in the Douro River and the city of Porto during the blue hour from Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal. c/u/n Poco2 18:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 18:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)- Support YES! I have added some notes that would be good to see fixed (if possible). I think, compared to the overall image, these are very minor with maybe the exception of the mast that hovers above the buildings. KennyOMG -- 19:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Oppose NO! Sorry, more an answer to the above. Many artifacts of HDR, and very obviously not levelled (tilted to the right). Misleading banks on both sides. On a positive note, I like the colours and the slightly blurry boats (which bring dynamism ;) ). Fairly sure another projection / crop and more careful stitch would improve the picture. - Benh (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'm sure Poco will fix the horizon and prob most of the hdr artifacts as well (how about tagging those that bother you?) -- KennyOMG (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Neutral I like the background very much, but blurry boats are too distractive for me. --Ivar (talk) 19:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)- Support I love the movement of the boats,
although there are a few aliasing artefacts probably caused by the HDR. Especially look at the people on the far right hand side of the image. I think this one might need a little bit of work, but it should be FP with a few errors resolved.Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC) - Support I appreciate the enthusiasm above, nothing too bad--Boothsift 23:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment Looks a bit oversaturated to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)- Comment @KennyOMG, Cmao20, Basile Morin, and Benh: I've fixed all notes (at least I hope so), some leaning buildings (in the middle) and the saturation. Later today or tomorrow I'll address the HDR artifacts and the perspective on both sides, Poco2 18:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Neutral The boats are too blurry for me --Llez (talk) 02:22, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 04:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @KennyOMG, Cmao20, Basile Morin, and Benh: FYI I am through now with the artifacts and perspective, also applied a tilt Poco2 09:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Can't see any more HDR artefacts on the right now, so I'm pretty happy. Thanks for making the changes. Cmao20 (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Benh "Misleading banks on both sides". On Google Maps, and presumably reality, the bank is flat, not 90°. Which, on an educational media repository, is of some importance. It is a shame you opted for yet another 180° panorama since, as Benh notes, there was certainly an opportunity to make a composition with the dancing blurred boats and a portion of the city. -- Colin (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Google Maps also has no horizon, so the course of the coast does not bother me, but the blurry boats. --Milseburg (talk) 08:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Colin and Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
