Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 12.jpg

File:Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 12.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2017 at 05:06:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 12.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 12.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info General view of Monaco. Created and uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Technically it's somewhat ho-humm, the left right 10% or so is extremely soft and even in the middle you can see blotches where the hot air washed out details. -- KennyOMG (talk) 13:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Big file, QI and high EV, it's probably the best angle to view the principality Poco² 17:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's a nice scene, with beautiful colors. However I feel like the land takes up too little visual weight, with there being too much water all around. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose. The current FP view of Monaco is File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, a very impressive picture with nice blue skies. Of course this is a good photo, but it doesn't compare, in my opinion, and I don't like the diffuse light in the sky much. I think File:Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 15.jpg, which puts a tall building right in front of the viewer's face and has less and bluer sky, is a more compelling image, which I would probably vote to feature. The other QI in this category that, while imperfect, seems most appropriate to consider for FP would be File:Hafen und Felsen von Monaco-La Turbie.jpg. That one is a bit hazy on overly close inspection, but it's quite interesting to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Well below the standards of Diego's other FPs. Washed out color (and the WB feels too warm) as well as poor detail in the city streets. Daniel Case (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. --Karelj (talk) 21:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 18:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)