Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent - St. Paul's from the Surrey Side of Blackfriars Bridge, figures and sailing barges in the foreground.jpg

File:Vincent - St. Paul's from the Surrey Side of Blackfriars Bridge, figures and sailing barges in the foreground.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2021 at 22:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent - St. Paul's from the Surrey Side of Blackfriars Bridge, figures and sailing barges in the foreground.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent - St. Paul's from the Surrey Side of Blackfriars Bridge, figures and sailing barges in the foreground.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Frescos
•  Info created by George Vincent- uploaded by Amitchell125 - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment This would be a very good VIC nomination, but it's probably too small for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
• It's not clear if Amitchell took the photograph. If not, the frame would probably be copyrighted and needs to be cropped out. Buidhe (talk) 02:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I can't understand why the frames may be copyrighted, nothing special on it Ezarateesteban 20:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Frames are 3-dimensional and therefore not covered by COM:PD-Art. See the section "When should the PD-Art tag not be used?" Buidhe (talk) 06:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I disagree that it's too small. Of course we have had much larger, but I am willing to accept this. With the frame excluded it's ~7.2megapixels of content, which is OK for me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment The reason I think it's probably too small for FP is that we've had so many nominations of photos of framed paintings at humongous resolutions. I think it's very fair to compare the quality of photos in the same category when considering FPC nominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
  • It's 2 pixels per millimeter in length or 2,500 pixels per square inch, which seems OK to me. A larger painting would need more pixels. Buidhe (talk) 07:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I tend to disagree, but that's OK. I did take the size of the painting into account, of course. It's on the larger side, not huge, but certainly not small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 30 April 2021 (UTC)