Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ville de Québec 05.jpg

File:Ville de Québec 05.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2017 at 01:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ville de Québec 05.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ville de Québec 05.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Thanks to Ikan Kekek for your recomendation and comment in QIC. Cite: Yeah, great photo! I'm almost a bit tempted to consider it a possible FP because of the lighting, but I suspect too many people would consider the subject too ordinary to support this at FPC. But regardless, it's excellent. All by -- The Photographer 01:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Very lovely - I'm someone who thinks great lighting can make an ordinary subject extraordinary. But I think the yellow WB is overdone. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done King of. I'm a not a good example, however, a good photographer maybe need amazing subjects to make FPs but convert commons ordinary subjects in amazing compositions it make you a great photographer. --The Photographer 02:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

 Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support per my comment in QIC. I really like this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support A great example of how light (and a good angle) can transform a subject. The scene is not that ordinary though; how many streets are so clean and well-kept, have such beautiful street lamps or flower arrangements. --cart-Talk 08:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry no. Does not speak to me.--Jebulon (talk) 08:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Jebulon. I think WB is more original on first one. --Mile (talk) 09:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Mile Possibly that version could more beautiful for you, however, those colors are not the real ones, my idea is to show the closest thing to reality. --The Photographer 15:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

• Maybe. But at least you could solve halos around pillars, clocks. Something like CA, but on one is very strange, halos without color on right one. --Mile (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

I can't see what you tell, maybe you could add some note. --The Photographer 21:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Mellow and lovely composition. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Mood… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing of interesting for me... --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support nice Ezarateesteban 20:19, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Haloes, and just too busy to really work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Yann (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The day seems to be pleasant to be outside but that's it. Nothing exceptional for me here. -- Pofka (talk) 18:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Although someone could say that there's nothing special about it, I believe it is: the atmosphere and the lighting are very well captured. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:55, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice light and mood, but nothing more. Ordinary sceen, not outstandig. --Milseburg (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose shadowshadowshadow... 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 07:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC).

@Clear Sky C: Please sign your vote. Thanks. --Hockei (talk) 07:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done[1] 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 07:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Jebulon. --Karelj (talk) 13:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)