Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Kirchenplatz Pfarrkirche hl Jakob 07082015 6568.jpg

File:Villach Kirchenplatz Pfarrkirche hl Jakob 07082015 6568.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2015 at 14:29:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Kirchenplatz Pfarrkirche hl Jakob 07082015 6568.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villach Kirchenplatz Pfarrkirche hl Jakob 07082015 6568.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rainbow unicorn (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too distorted, too tide crop on right and left. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry. But it is very distorted indeed and the tower is too bright. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:46, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

  @Spurzem: : Why do you find the tower to be too bright? — Julian H.^✈ 08:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

@Julian Herzog: Die Umrahmung des Fensters unter der Uhr und die Lisenen bzw. Mauerstreifen an den Ecken des Turms heben sich nicht oder nicht genügend vom übrigen Mauerwerk ab. Die Kirche ist insgesamt ziemlich hell und speziell der Turm ist zu hell. Freundlichen Gruß und bitte nichts für ungut -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

 Done Thanks, Lothar, for for your constructive assessment. I acted on your hints and charged an altered version. --Johann Jaritz 10:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Well done. --Tremonist (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 15:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too distorted. It looks wrong, and the EXIF confirms some unusual perspective changes (horizontal perspective and significant changes to aspect ratio don't appear compatible with a faithful representation of a 3D object). -- Colin (talk) 11:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin. --El Grafo (talk) 08:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)