Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg

File:View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2018 at 20:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Helldalsisen and the peak from Blåfjell.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info View from the same location, but in the opposite direction of this picture: Mørsvikbotn seen from Blåfjell created by Frankemann - uploaded by Frankemann - nominated by Frankemann -- Frankemann (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Frankemann (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
• Mild  Oppose - I appreciate your labeling. However, the one place you don't label is the part of the picture that I love: The rock and beautifully lit snow in the near left corner. Most of the rest of the picture is quite hazy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much of the picture is dark -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question Hi Ikan Kekek and Basile Morin, do you think that adjusting the light in the dark areas will help?
    Kind regards --Frankemann (talk) 14:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

• As I see this landscape, nearly everything is in the darkness. The luminous small rock in the foreground is nice, but isolated. Not sure you can manage to light this valley artificially -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

• Yes, much of it is kind of dark, but it is also a special glow to the landscape because of the very low sun. --Frankemann (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

• I don't know, but I wasn't disturbed by the light: It was the amount of haze that was my issue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

• I understand what you mean Ikan Kekek. I think it is due to high ISO and a lot of humidity in the air. I have purchased a very small and easy tripod for such occasions. Too bad I had no such thing on this trip. --Frankemann (talk) 20:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Nice light and very instructive. --Milseburg (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Milseburg --Code (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ikan. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose Support No better example of that soft Arctic summer evening light have I seen, and as for the colors ... it's so Maxfield Parrish. But there's too much noise in the shadows, and I get the feeling the land may have been processed too much. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

If it wasn't processed, then what we have is acceptable. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment Daniel, from comment on a previous nomination, I got the impression that this photographer doesn't use photo image programs and that his photos are straight out of camera. Is that how it is, Frankemann? --Cart (talk) 09:46, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment Well Cart, I have used such programs sometimes, especially to correct the white balance for pictures with snow and strong sun. However, this image has not been processed. Kind regards --Frankemann (talk) 11:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:48, 1 July 2018 (UTC)