Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Doubrava 2019.jpg

File:View from Doubrava 2019.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2020 at 16:26:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View from Doubrava 2019.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Doubrava 2019.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Czech Republic
•  Info All by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Since it's passed QIC, let's try to push it even further. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Why not, nice atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 17:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, there are a fair few dust spots and clone stamp marks. Crossing out my vote for now. Cmao20 (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose A lot of dust spots and clone stamp marks ruin the overall unusually atmosphere.--Ermell (talk) 19:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose the cables are a problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:46, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - The cables are no problem for me - they're just lines! But do work on the problems noted by Ermell. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice, but I would second the request to work on the problems spotted by Ermell. --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell. --Fischer.H (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Primarily the dust spots, but even if they were fixed this wouldn't have worked. I can see what the photographer was trying for but, as I've said before, sometimes our reach exceeds our grasp. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)