Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Col d'Izoard.jpg

File:View from Col d'Izoard.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2014 at 10:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View from Col d'Izoard.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Col d'Izoard.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominatored by NickGibson3900 -- NickGibson3900 (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- NickGibson3900 (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry Nick, but the image you have nominated has been overprocessed to death. Strong yellow cast, very artificial looking background. I would propose that you try to nominate a few photos at COM:QIC to get some feedback on the technical aspects of your photos prior to nominating at FPC. Less than one in a thousand images on Commons becomes featured. At QIC you are likely to get qualified feedback which will help you improve your photography. --Slaunger (talk) 11:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry, bit this is an color accident and full posterized. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Much better now, but now too noisy and too soft = unsharp. I think your camera (iPod touch) isn't perfect for this kind of FP-shoots. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above -- Jiel (talk) 18:49, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. At first I thought the point of this image was to demonstrate the dangers of overprocessing. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

@Slaunger: @Alchemist-hp: @Jiel: @Daniel Case: I completely understand all of you and I have uploaded the original photo which isn't over processed. NickGibson3900 (talk) 04:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment The new version is much better and good for many uses. Unfortunately, it is still not at the quality level expected for a FP, but that is admittedly very hard to achieve with a mobile phone/ipod camera. --DXR (talk) 11:41, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Remix from original - View from Col d'Izoard by NickGibson3900. Please dear NickGibson3900 evaluate this alternative, I liked the picture and I think this might be useful. If you do not agree please comment that I remove this alternative. Partial fix noise and intensified colors. Thank you -- Lauro Sirgado^contribs 00:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I like it Lauro Sirgado, lets go with this one. NickGibson3900 (talk) 06:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose better, but still posterized. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 06:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose It has improved a lot from the first version now, but I am afraid that the technical quality is just not good enough for FP. Sorry, but it is very challenging to reach FP status with such a very compact camera as in the iPod touch. Quite nice view, but it does not stand out in particular as compared to the many other excellent mountain views we have. --Slaunger (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice pic but bad quality. You don’t need a full-frame DSLR, even my compact Pana Lumix would have done much better. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 00:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 15:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)