Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viaduc - arches (Chaumont).jpg

File:Viaduc - arches (Chaumont).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 10:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Viaduc - arches (Chaumont).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Viaduc - arches (Chaumont).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 10:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support But cables interfere. -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 10:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment I like it, but I've never seen weak support from the photographer who nominated their own work, and I don't know how to react to that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Sorry, so I fully support (I wanted to be realistic, the cables can disturb). Gzen92 ^[discuter] 13:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kreuzschnabel 14:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The cables are an eyesore but the geometry is remarkable :) - Benh (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I tried to erase them, but too complex. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 14:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm OK with the cables; the only thing that bothers me is some unsharpness in the upper foreground. But I love the view through the arches. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That wiring is not a plus but the perspective is really nice --Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Like a Infinity mirror --Wilfredor (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Cables don't really bother me so much. Lovely photo. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The wirings are not OK for me.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Eye-catching -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cant those wires be solved !? --Mile (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please, don’t! Such a large part is not easily cloned out, and that would be a serious alteration to reality and still look awful, I fear. Sure this is a matter of taste but the cables don’t spoil this image in my eyes, in fact it would be boring without them, too perfect to be real somehow. --Kreuzschnabel 19:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
• Kreuz you might be correct, if they would be in central line it would work somehow. Let's give a try. I would not be so sure until i compare them. Is size original Gzen92. You can mail me if in RAW format. --Mile (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
  • No RAW sorry. Removing the cables on the ground would be feasible (in the dark it's more complicated), but we must recreate the shadow of the barrier. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Well send jpeg. What is drawn at the end of hall ? Seems un-original. --Mile (talk) 08:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

The version of September 11, 2020, 2:02 PM is the original, no retouche. Greetings Gzen92 ^[discuter] 09:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Wonderful composition, but disturbing elements and details missing. It looks like a little bit oversharpened too. --XRay 💬 14:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges