Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vakil Mosque, 13 July 2017.jpg

File:Vakil Mosque, 13 July 2017.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2020 at 09:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vakil Mosque, 13 July 2017.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vakil Mosque, 13 July 2017.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
•  Info created by Yare zaman2000 - uploaded by Yare zaman2000 - nominated by Persia -- ahuR ☘ 09:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- ahuR ☘ 09:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Light and colours are nice, but I fear that the quality is not there, sorry. f/3.2 seems an odd choice for this kind of photograph, and indeed even important parts of the subject are very soft, e.g. the wall at the right. In addition, the crop at the top right is somewhat surprising; wouldn’t it be better to show more of the magnificent vault? Sorry again, --Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Aristeas' thoughtful review. The golden light on the left hand side is lovely and might nudge it into FP were the quality better, but there is quite a bit of blurring and unsharpness, and I too am not convinced by the crop. It's a beautiful picture but I don't think it is quite up to the standard especially since we've had so many lovely photos of Iranian architecture from Poco a poco and more recently from Amirpashaei. Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, and in addition, the floor looks odd with artifacts. It's a pity, because the motif is so beautiful, so I would have liked to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, it’s a pity. I would have been happy to support this photo, too, but looking into it I recognized it was not possible, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose My opposition doesn't reach the technical issues. Even without them, you have that awkward rectangle of blue sky at the upper left, and really this looks like a picture with several more definite FPs hiding in it. It's trying to do too much. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)