Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Võilille seemnis.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Võilille seemnis.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2016 at 23:17:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales
Info created and uploaded by Abrget47j - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment I would prefer much more depth of field (F3.8 used). Charles (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)- Support I actually like the depth of field. Helps the viewer focus on the essentials. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Shallow DOF is good when the subject is perfectly aligned. Not here. Jee 02:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)- Oppose per others. Depth of field is just a bit too shallow, making almost everything unsharp at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Once again: art meeting nature!--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support I think the shallow DoF here is pleasing and gives a sort of soft 'halo' to the pic. w.carter-Talk 10:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose DoF to low. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:37, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Personally I like the DOF. I don't see how you'd do otherwise for such a small object without focus-stacking -- Thennicke (talk) 15:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Jee, Ikan and Alchemist. I can understand a DoF that leaves the spores blurry. But it should have all of the kernel in focus. Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 21:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
