Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulipa bakeri 'Lilac Wonder' 09-05-2021. (d.j.b).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tulipa bakeri 'Lilac Wonder' 09-05-2021. (d.j.b).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2021 at 06:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Liliaceae
- Info created & uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment imo dark "halo" (created by stacking program) around the flower should be removed. --Ivar (talk) 08:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Photos re-stacked. Thanks for the review.--Famberhorst (talk) 11:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment one more error on bottom right corner (note added). --Ivar (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Background has been replaced with artificial background.Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Artificial backgrounds have the same info all over when you pull the levels to extremes (saturation and light); they are homogenous. This is what this photo looks like when you do that and there are plenty of blotches and information in the background. To compare, I made an artificial background for the photo, and with the same enhancement settings it looks like this. There is a big difference. You can download the photo and do this test yourself in Photoshop. --Cart (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- All I am doing is reading the statement on the file page. Check it out Cart. May be that is wrong, and if so I will change my vote. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I see that, thanks Charles for pointing it out, I only went by what I see in the photo and it doesn't seems to be added in a computer. I wonder if something hasn't gone lost in translation here. Famberhorst, when you write "artificial background", do you mean that you photographed the flower against a black wall or paper as opposed to a natural environment outdoors? Artificial for me is when the background is added later using color in the computer. We might be talking about two different things here. --Cart (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- The pot with the flower was placed against a dark background and then photographed.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. So only a language misunderstanding and how to use the 'retouched' template. I see that you have removed the text from the template. The template can be completely removed since it is not needed for the very small corrections you have made. It should only be used for bigger alterations in the computer. --Cart (talk) 06:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support great compo, but the closest area to the camera is not perfectly in focus. --Ivar (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Support --Commonists 13:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support you for promoting my photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Liliaceae