Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Treptowers, Alt-Treptow, Berlin, 1705252213, ako.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Treptowers, Alt-Treptow, Berlin, 1705252213, ako.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2017 at 13:04:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info The Treptowers are a complex of buildings in the district of Alt-Treptow (Berlin, Germany). I've planned to take this photo since a while until finally the weather was fine and I had the time to spend the whole evening at the river spree taking several pictures of these buildings (while there was some kind of party going on around me). The one I like the most is this late blue-hour shot. It's a tone-mapped HDR picture from three single exposures (camera settings: ISO 400, f/8, 5s; 10s; 20s). I wish I had a 24mm TS-E lens, that would have been even better. But Lightroom did quite a good job in terms of perspective correction, too. A little amount of noise wasn't completely avoidable here and I dind't want to push the noise reduction too far because this would destroy the details. All by me -- Code (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Code (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment It's really well done, except the reflections of the lights in the water which are distorted. Can you sort? Charles (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Charles, what are you expecting me to do? That's what the camera captured and I just can't change it. To be honest I find your recent critique of my pictures (see here and here) somewhat remarkable, but not in a good sense of the word. Don't get me wrong - if you don't like my pictures I'll be fine with that but don't suggest me to change things I'm just not able to change. --Code (talk) 15:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- I commented on this photo of yours because you used a 6 second exposure and the flag was therefore very blurred and I didn't like it. Why should I like it? Charles (talk) 17:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support A lot of these images are stitched, so if that was the case you could do something. As it's just one image, then obviously not, so you have my support. Charles (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Jee 14:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support I was expecting this nom --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support I've experienced the same curving of reflected light, wonder what physics are involved here... --cart-Talk 18:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I think you have a dust spot in a very unfortunate place: just above the leftmost street lamp. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- @KennyOMG: I think I removed it. It was hard to find at all. --Code (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- I admit I only noticed by accident. :) The fix looks a bit weird, if you don't mind I uploaded my take to dropbox. -- KennyOMG (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I looked at the picture on two different screens but I just don't see anything that looked like a dust spot any more. --Code (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ican see you cloned it out, all I was saying it looks weird now. See the .png in the dropbox link above for my take on it. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Conditional support on fixing the dust spot. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Great! That very slight noise is pretty much nothing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Picture-perfect scene. Only wish the lights were slightly less overexposed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Perfect -- Thennicke (talk) 05:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. Atsme 📞 15:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- weak support Because it's a bit noisy. Especially visible on the water and around the lamp light right. But otherwise grandiose. --Hockei (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 19:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Daphne Lantier 21:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
