Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Transport of buffalos on the Mekong.jpg

File:Transport of buffalos on the Mekong.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2017 at 04:47:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Transport of buffalos on the Mekong.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Transport of buffalos on the Mekong.jpg

29

44

5609

3526

6556

4371

crop? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
•  Info created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I had this on my list to nominate, too. Picturesque and nicely composed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Gorgeous in all its particulars. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:07, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment see note - I've suggested a tighter crop. The compo's too centered imo. But it's a great image --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  weak support better, though crop could be more radical. It's a pity that the boy's looking in our direction --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral Lack of details in the outer parts of the background --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not quite FP level. Martin's crop suggestion helps. The boy looking at the camera rather spoils it. -- Colin (talk) 21:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

• New version  cropped -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Not quite perfect, but I'm guessing you had a lot of constraints from the situation and got what you could. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, the main constraints I had was the speed of the boat and the direction of the sun. Obviously my tripod was of no use here :-) Though I'm still happy with this shot. The other versions I have with the boy looking left make no difference, from my point of view, because his eyes are hidden behind the shadow of his cap, and that detail is probably less important than his particular posture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Neutral I like the composition, but IMO not sharp enough. --XRay ^talk 06:09, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin + light a bit dull. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)