Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia.jpg

File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 21:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
• Mild  Oppose - I've been following the progress of your photography of Venice and have been looking for more images that I believe are featurable and likely to get enough votes. I strongly approve of and support this great project. However, while this is certainly a nice photo, I don't find the sky active or interesting enough to support featuring it. However, I think that if you crop the top of the photo by almost half, so that there is just a small amount of space above the campanile of San Marco, it will be a better and featurable photo. -- Ikan Kekek
• Thanks for your suggestion. I uploaded a new alternative version as suggestet from @Ikan Kekek: . I am not able to nominate it; maybe someone can help please. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk) 21:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

• I think the alternative still has too much sky. My suggestion is to do a horizontal crop quite close to the top of the campanile, probably not as far above it as the distance from the beginning of the conical part to the top (I hope it's clear what I mean - the crop still should be above the top of the campanile!). I think if you do that, the composition will really work. But if you prefer, do see what other people think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks, are you able to post the alternative for me @Ikan Kekek: ? Thanks a lot--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

• Mild/moderate  Support. I like this because it's a romantic scene, and in this version, there's more nearly balance between water and sky. The scene is beautiful. The striations in the sky are a bit unusual, but for the most part, I think they help the form because they give the viewer's eyes some scope for motion, and they're much more viewable at this size than in the other versions that have more sky in them. By the way, this is my first time posting an alternative, so if anyone would like to tweak the pixel dimensions that I copied from the alternative submission of File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 03.jpg, please do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
• Mild  Support INeverCry 19:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support And 7... --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice orange but the sky seems posterized for me. --Laitche (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 18:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice atmosphere, i really like this picture, but sky is strongly over processed, sorry :( -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

The chosen alternative is: File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia 2.jpg